An Insight into the Impact of Thermal Process on Dissolution Profile and Physical Characteristics of Theophylline Tablets Made through 3D Printing Compared to Conventional Methods

• Published in: Biomedicines Vol. 10; no. 6; p. 1335
• Main Authors: Nashed, Nour, Lam, Matthew, Ghafourian, Taravat, Pausas, Lluis, Jiri, Memory, Majumder, Mridul, Nokhodchi, Ali
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 06.06.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: 3-D printers; 3D printing; Cellulose; Differential scanning calorimetry; Dissolution; Drug delivery; Drug dosages; drug release; fused deposition modeling; hot-melt extrusion; Infrared spectroscopy; Investigations; manufacturing method; Mechanical properties; Permeability; Physical characteristics; Polymer blends; Porosity; Printing; Tablets; Theophylline; United Kingdom > UK; United States > US; density; porosity; manufacturing method; fused deposition modeling; drug release; hot-melt extrusion; 3D printing
• ISSN: 2227-9059; 2227-9059
• DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061335

The dissolution profile is of great importance in drug delivery and is affected by the manufacturing method. Thus, it is important to study the influence of the thermal process on drug release in emerging technologies such as 3D printing-fused deposition modeling (FDM). For this purpose, the characteristics of 3D printed tablets were compared to those of tablets prepared by other thermal methods such as hot-melt extrusion (HME) and non-thermal methods such as physical mixture (PM). Theophylline was used as a drug model and blends of ethyl cellulose (EC) and hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) were used as a matrix former. The solid state of the drug in all formulations was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray powder diffraction, and Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy. All studied tablets had the same weight and surface area/volume (SA/V). Dissolution data showed that, for some formulations, printed tablets interestingly had a faster release profile despite having the highest hardness values (>550 N) compared to HME and PM tablets. Porosity investigations showed that 100% infill printed tablets had the highest porosity (~20%) compared to HME (<10%) and PM tablets (≤11%). True density records were the lowest in printed tablets (~1.22 g/m3) compared to tablets made from both HME and PM methods (~1.26 g/m3), reflecting the possible increase in polymer specific volume while printing. This increase in the volume of polymer network may accelerate water and drug diffusion from/within the matrix. Thus, it is a misconception that the 3D printing process will always retard drug release based on increased tablet hardness. Hardness, porosity, density, solid-state of the drug, SA/V, weight, and formulation components are all factors contributing to the release profile where the total balance can either slow down or accelerate the release profile.