Does experience sharing affect farmers’ pro-environmental behavior? A randomized controlled trial in Vietnam

•We examine the effect of an information treatment via “peer farmers” and a 50% price subsidy treatment on organic fertilizer adoption.•We conduct a randomized controlled trial with 1287 tea-cultivating farmers in Vietnam.•Both treatments have significant impacts on farmers’ adoption of organic fert...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld development Vol. 136; p. 105062
Main Authors Vu, Ha Thu, Tran, Duc, Goto, Daisaku, Kawata, Keisuke
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2020
Elsevier Science Publishers
Pergamon Press Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•We examine the effect of an information treatment via “peer farmers” and a 50% price subsidy treatment on organic fertilizer adoption.•We conduct a randomized controlled trial with 1287 tea-cultivating farmers in Vietnam.•Both treatments have significant impacts on farmers’ adoption of organic fertilizer.•The information treatment is approximately one-third as effective as the subsidy treatment.•The information treatment performs well for members of certification groups. Encouraging farmers to adopt pro-environmental production is vital to the promotion of sustainable agriculture. Previous observational studies emphasize the importance of economic incentives and information access to farmers’ decision-making processes; however, due to endogeneity issues, little strong causal evidence is available. This study makes an original contribution by experimentally examining the impacts of the 50% price subsidy and information treatments on farmers’ adoption of organic fertilizer. A short video sharing the experience of farmers who have applied organic fertilizer is selected as our information treatment. We analyze data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted with 1287 small-scale tea farmers in Vietnam. We find significant impacts of both the information and 50% price subsidy treatments. Moreover, the effect of the former is approximately one-third that of the latter. Subgroup treatment analysis also reveals that the information treatment performs well for members of certification groups. Thus, to induce farmers to adopt pro-environmental production behaviors, information treatment can partially substitute for subsidies to reduce the burden on the public budget.
ISSN:0305-750X
1873-5991
DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105062