Appropriate Safeguards and Article 89 of the GDPR: Considerations for Biobank, Databank and Genetic Research
The collection and use of biological samples and data for genetic research, or for storage in a biobank or databank for future research, impacts upon many fundamental rights, including the right to dignity, the right to private and family life, the right to protection of personal data, the right to...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in genetics Vol. 13; p. 719317 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
18.02.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The collection and use of biological samples and data for genetic research, or for storage in a biobank or databank for future research, impacts upon many fundamental rights, including the right to dignity, the right to private and family life, the right to protection of personal data, the right to freedom of arts and sciences, and the right to non-discrimination. The use of genetic data and other health-related data in this context must be used in a manner that is rooted in human rights. Owing in part to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force, the right to the protection of personal data in the context of scientific research has been afforded increasing attention. The GDPR gives effect to the right to data protection, but states that this right must be balanced against other rights and interests. The GDPR applies to all personal data, with specific attention to special categories of data, that includes health and genetic data. The collection, access to, and sharing of such data must comply with the GDPR, and therefore directly impacts the use of such data in research. The GDPR does provide for several derogations and exemptions for research from many of the strict processing requirements. Such derogations are permitted only if there are appropriate safeguards in place. Article 89 states that to be appropriate, safeguards must be “in accordance” with the GDPR “for the rights and freedoms of the data subject”. In particular, those safeguards must ensure “respect for the principle of data minimisation”. Despite the importance of safeguards, the GDPR is silent as to the specific measures that may be adopted to meet these requirements. This paper considers Article 89 and explores safeguards that may be deemed appropriate in the context of biobanks, databanks, and genetic research. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Debra Mathews, Johns Hopkins University, United States Edited by: Nut Koonrungsesomboon, Chiang Mai University, Thailand This article was submitted to ELSI in Science and Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics Reviewed by: Chih-hsing Ho, Academia Sinica, Taiwan Kenji Hirayama, Nagasaki University, Japan |
ISSN: | 1664-8021 1664-8021 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fgene.2022.719317 |