Safety assessment of l-lysine oral intake: a systematic review

Currently, the use of amino acids in supplements and functional foods is increasing globally. However, there are no guidelines for the upper limit of ingestion for the safe use of these amino acids. Safety evaluation of chemical substances is generally performed through non-clinical and clinical stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmino acids Vol. 51; no. 4; pp. 647 - 659
Main Authors Hayamizu, Kohsuke, Oshima, Ikuyo, Fukuda, Zesoku, Kuramochi, Yui, Nagai, Yuki, Izumo, Nobuo, Nakano, Makoto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Vienna Springer Vienna 01.04.2019
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Currently, the use of amino acids in supplements and functional foods is increasing globally. However, there are no guidelines for the upper limit of ingestion for the safe use of these amino acids. Safety evaluation of chemical substances is generally performed through non-clinical and clinical studies. However, amino acids that have these safety data are limited. Therefore, we used a systematic review approach for evaluating the safety of amino acids. In the present study, we evaluated the safety of l -lysine added to an ordinary diet in humans. Using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ichushi Web, and EBSCO host as search databases, we comprehensively searched human studies on oral ingestion of l -lysine. Ultimately, 71 studies were selected for evaluation. Of these, 12 studies were of relatively high quality with Jadad scores ≥ 3. The dose range of l -lysine in the selected studies was 16.8–17,500 mg/day, and the range of dosing period was 1–1095 days. The observed adverse events were mainly subjective symptoms related to the gastrointestinal tract such as nausea, stomachache, and diarrhea. The provisional no-observed-adverse-effect level obtained based on these gastrointestinal symptoms was 6000 mg/person/day. Integrated analysis of the risk for developing gastrointestinal symptoms revealed that the risk ratio was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.96–1.07; p  = 0.49); thus, no significant increase was observed. (UMIN000028914)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0939-4451
1438-2199
1438-2199
DOI:10.1007/s00726-019-02697-3