Electrostimulation with or without ultrasound-guidance in interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery

In a prospective controlled trial to compare conventional interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) using anatomic landmarks and electro-stimulation with a combined technique of ultrasound guidance followed by nerve stimulation, 60 patients were randomized into 2 matched equal groups: Group A using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of anesthesia Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 610 - 613
Main Authors Salem, Mohamed H., Winckelmann, Jörg, Geiger, Peter, Mehrkens, Hans-Hinrich, Salem, Khaled H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Springer Japan 01.08.2012
Springer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In a prospective controlled trial to compare conventional interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) using anatomic landmarks and electro-stimulation with a combined technique of ultrasound guidance followed by nerve stimulation, 60 patients were randomized into 2 matched equal groups: Group A using nerve stimulation (NS) alone and Group B using the combination of ultrasound and NS. The time to detect the plexus (3.9 ± 4 min in Group A and 3.3 ± 1.4 min in Group B) was not significantly different. We needed to reposition the needle once ( n  = 13) or twice ( n  = 4) in Group B. First-shot motor response was achieved in all but one patient in Group A; here we were only able to locate the plexus by use of ultrasound. None of the patients needed general anaesthesia. There were no significant differences between postoperative pain, motor power, or patient’s satisfaction. ISBPB seems similarly effective using electro-stimulation and ultrasound if performed by experienced anesthesiologists.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0913-8668
1438-8359
DOI:10.1007/s00540-012-1366-x