The value of automated gel column agglutination technology in the identification of true inherited D blood types in massively transfused patients

• Published in: Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 49; no. 8; pp. 1672 - 1677
• Main Authors: Summers Jr, Thomas, Johnson, Viviana V., Stephan, John P., Johnson, Gloria J., Leonard, George
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.08.2009; Wiley
• Subjects: Adult; Agglutination; Anesthesia; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Anesthesia: equipment, devices; Biological and medical sciences; Blood Group Incompatibility - prevention & control; Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - instrumentation; Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - methods; Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Rh-Hr Blood-Group System; Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy; Wounds and Injuries - therapy; Human; Columns; Transfusion
• ISSN: 0041-1132; 1537-2995
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02194.x

BACKGROUND: Massive transfusion of D− trauma patients in the combat setting involves the use of D+ red blood cells (RBCs) or whole blood along with suboptimal pretransfusion test result documentation. This presents challenges to the transfusion service of tertiary care military hospitals who ultimately receive these casualties because initial D typing results may only reflect the transfused RBCs. After patients are stabilized, mixed‐field reaction results on D typing indicate the patient's true inherited D phenotype. This case series illustrates the utility of automated gel column agglutination in detecting mixed‐field reactions in these patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The transfusion service test results, including the automated gel column agglutination D typing results, of four massively transfused D− patients transfused D+ RBCs is presented. To test the sensitivity of the automated gel column agglutination method in detecting mixed‐field agglutination reactions, a comparative analysis of three automated technologies using predetermined mixtures of D+ and D− RBCs is also presented. RESULTS: The automated gel column agglutination method detected mixed‐field agglutination in D typing in all four patients and in the three prepared control specimens. The automated microwell tube method identified one of the three prepared control specimens as indeterminate, which was subsequently manually confirmed as a mixed‐field reaction. The automated solid‐phase method was unable to detect any mixed fields. CONCLUSION: The automated gel column agglutination method provides a sensitive means for detecting mixed‐field agglutination reactions in the determination of the true inherited D phenotype of combat casualties transfused massive amounts of D+ RBCs.