Public mandates, market monitoring, and nonprofit financial disclosures

Public officials have recently sought increased regulation of financial disclosures from not-for-profit organizations as a means of improving accountability with the public. One objective of this study is to examine whether not-for-profit entities already subject to audit requirements submit financi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of accounting and public policy Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 71 - 88
Main Author Calabrese, Thad D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Inc 2011
Elsevier
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
SeriesJournal of Accounting and Public Policy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Public officials have recently sought increased regulation of financial disclosures from not-for-profit organizations as a means of improving accountability with the public. One objective of this study is to examine whether not-for-profit entities already subject to audit requirements submit financial reports in compliance with GAAP. Further, since the majority of not-for-profit organizations are not subject to public audit mandates, this study also ascertains whether other market actors such as donors monitor and demand accrual-based financial information. The empirical analyses indicate that not-for-profit organizations subject to public audit mandates are largely in compliance with GAAP, although a significant minority of organizations subject to state requirements is not; further analyses suggest that external oversight significantly influence the use of accrual reporting. Models are also tested on a subsample of not-for-profits that switched from cash to accrual reporting, with the results suggesting that increasing public and market oversight have a significant effect on the decision to switch methods. The overall results suggest that public and market actors demand accrual-based financial reporting from not-for-profit organizations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0278-4254
1873-2070
DOI:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.007