Effector and central memory T helper 2 cells respond differently to peptide immunotherapy
Peptide immunotherapy (PIT) offers realistic prospects for the treatment of allergic diseases, including allergic asthma. Much is understood of the behavior of naive T cells in response to PIT. However, treatment of patients with ongoing allergic disease requires detailed understanding of the respon...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 111; no. 8; pp. E784 - E793 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
25.02.2014
National Acad Sciences |
Series | PNAS Plus |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Peptide immunotherapy (PIT) offers realistic prospects for the treatment of allergic diseases, including allergic asthma. Much is understood of the behavior of naive T cells in response to PIT. However, treatment of patients with ongoing allergic disease requires detailed understanding of the responses of allergen-experienced T cells. CD62L expression by allergen-experienced T cells corresponds to effector/effector memory (CD62L ˡᵒ) and central memory (CD62L ʰⁱ) subsets, which vary with allergen exposure (e.g., during, or out with, pollen season). The efficacy of PIT on different T helper 2 (Th2) cell memory populations is unknown. We developed a murine model of PIT in allergic airway inflammation (AAI) driven by adoptively transferred, traceable ovalbumin-experienced Th2 cells. PIT effectively suppressed AAI driven by unfractionated Th2 cells. Selective transfer of CD62L ʰⁱ and CD62L ˡᵒ Th2 cells revealed that these two populations behaved differently from one another and from previously characterized (early deletional) responses of naive CD4 ⁺ T cells to PIT. Most notably, allergen-reactive CD62L ˡᵒ Th2 cells were long-lived within the lung after PIT, before allergen challenge, in contrast to CD62L ʰⁱ Th2 cells. Despite this, PIT was most potent against CD62L ˡᵒ Th2 cells in protecting from AAI, impairing their ability to produce Th2 cytokines, whereas this capacity was heightened in PIT-treated CD62L ʰⁱ Th2 cells. We conclude that Th2 cells do not undergo an early deletional form of tolerance after PIT. Moreover, memory Th2 subsets respond differently to PIT. These findings have implications for the clinical translation of PIT in different allergic scenarios. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316178111 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 1D.J.N. and M.D.L. contributed equally to this work. Edited* by Philippa Marrack, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, and approved January 22, 2014 (received for review August 27, 2013) Author contributions: K.J.M., S.E.M.H., J.S., and S.M.A. designed research; K.J.M., D.J.N., M.D.L., A.J.M., C.W., P.M.F., and R.A.O. performed research; K.J.M., D.J.N., M.D.L., A.J.M., C.W., and R.A.O. analyzed data; and K.J.M., S.E.M.H., J.S., and S.M.A. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1316178111 |