A new method for measuring lymphoproliferation at the single-cell level in whole blood cultures by flow cytometry

A simple and reproducible method is described for the measurement of proliferative responses to mitogens and antigens. Whole blood (WB) cultures are used and separation procedures are not necessary. Proliferative responses are monitored as development of lymphoblasts determined by flow cytometry (FC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of immunological methods Vol. 195; no. 1; pp. 63 - 72
Main Authors Gaines, Hans, Andersson, Lena, Biberfeld, Gunnel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 09.09.1996
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A simple and reproducible method is described for the measurement of proliferative responses to mitogens and antigens. Whole blood (WB) cultures are used and separation procedures are not necessary. Proliferative responses are monitored as development of lymphoblasts determined by flow cytometry (FC). Lymphocytes and lymphoblasts were shown to be exclusively selectable from mixed cell populations of WB by their light scatter profile on FC analysis. More than 90% of the lymphoblasts identified by FC were replicating DNA as determined by incorporation of the thymidine analogue 2-bromo-5-deoxyuridine. The WB FC technique can be combined with triple immunofluorescence which was illustrated by determining subsets of lymphoblasts developing following stimulation with various mitogens and antigens. The new method was compared with the conventional method (peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture and proliferation measured by detection of DNA synthesis). The reproducibility of the methods were not different. The antigen-induced responses recorded by both methods correlated, but with significantly higher stimulation indices obtained by WB FC . The latter procedure was also technically easier to perform and less time-consuming.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-1759
1872-7905
DOI:10.1016/0022-1759(96)00085-3