Early experiences with computed axial tomography colonography

Computed axial tomography (CT) colonography is the latest radiologic technique to be used to image the large bowel. We studied its role as a diagnostic tool in colorectal practice. One hundred and three patients suspected of having colorectal pathology underwent CT colonography. CT colonography sugg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 187; no. 4; pp. 511 - 514
Main Authors Serracino-Inglott, Ferdinand, Atkinson, Henry D.E, Jha, Paul, Parker, Ian, Anderson, David N
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.04.2004
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.029

Cover

More Information
Summary:Computed axial tomography (CT) colonography is the latest radiologic technique to be used to image the large bowel. We studied its role as a diagnostic tool in colorectal practice. One hundred and three patients suspected of having colorectal pathology underwent CT colonography. CT colonography suggested a diagnosis of colonic carcinoma in 18 patients, and 17 of these underwent surgery. A colorectal neoplasm was not found in only 1 patient who had extrinsic colonic compression by an ovarian cyst. Twenty-one patients had suspected colonic polyps on scanning. Subsequent endoscopy in 19 of these patients confirmed the presence of polyps in only 10. CT colonography also revealed valuable extracolonic pathology: 8 occult noncolonic neoplasms and 163 other incidental findings. CT colonography has good patient compliance and is a useful diagnostic modality in detecting colorectal neoplasms. Its main advantage over other such investigative tools is its ability to detect extracolonic pathology.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.029