English-learning one- to two-year-olds do not show a consonant bias in word learning

Following the proposal that consonants are more involved than vowels in coding the lexicon (Nespor, Peña & Mehler, 2003), an early lexical consonant bias was found from age 1;2 in French but an equal sensitivity to consonants and vowels from 1;0 to 2;0 in English. As different tasks were used in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of child language Vol. 41; no. 5; pp. 1085 - 1114
Main Authors FLOCCIA, CAROLINE, NAZZI, THIERRY, DELLE LUCHE, CLAIRE, POLTROCK, SILVANA, GOSLIN, JEREMY
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.09.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Following the proposal that consonants are more involved than vowels in coding the lexicon (Nespor, Peña & Mehler, 2003), an early lexical consonant bias was found from age 1;2 in French but an equal sensitivity to consonants and vowels from 1;0 to 2;0 in English. As different tasks were used in French and English, we sought to clarify this ambiguity by using an interactive word-learning study similar to that used in French, with British-English-learning toddlers aged 1;4 and 1;11. Children were taught two CVC labels differing on either a consonant or vowel and tested on their pairing of a third object named with one of the previously taught labels, or part of them. In concert with previous research on British-English toddlers, our results provided no evidence of a general consonant bias. The language-specific mechanisms explaining the differential status for consonants and vowels in lexical development are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0305-0009
1469-7602
DOI:10.1017/S0305000913000287