The influence of sperm motility and cryopreservation on the treatment outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection following testicular sperm extraction

Introduction It is already known that embryo quality is a major contributing factor to the outcome of assisted reproduction techniques. This study focuses on treatment variables that might be of importance to the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection following testicular sperm extraction (TESE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica Vol. 94; no. 12; pp. 1313 - 1321
Main Authors Hessel, Marloes, Robben, Johanna C.M., D'Hauwers, Kathleen W.M., Braat, Didi D.M., Ramos, Liliana
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
French
German
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2015
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction It is already known that embryo quality is a major contributing factor to the outcome of assisted reproduction techniques. This study focuses on treatment variables that might be of importance to the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection following testicular sperm extraction (TESE‐ICSI) in non‐obstructive azoospermia. Material and methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Dutch tertiary care academic training hospital between July 2009 and December 2013. With logistic regression analysis we explored the influence of treatment variables, including testicular sperm parameters – (i) motile or tail touch spermatozoa, and (ii) use of fresh or frozen testicular semen‐samples – on biochemical and ongoing pregnancy rates after single (n = 393) and double embryo transfer (n = 352). Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the rank of the TESE‐ICSI attempt [odds ratio (OR) 0.8, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.70–0.93], the number of embryos available for transfer (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.06–1.19) and quality of the embryo(s) transferred (OR 12.8, 95% CI 5.00–32.67) as possible predictors of biochemical pregnancy, whereas only embryo quality (OR 16.9, 95% CI 5.23–54.87) was independently associated with ongoing pregnancy. Conclusions The use of cryopreserved testicular sperm does not negatively influence the ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate after TESE‐ICSI. However, sperm motility seems to increase the pregnancy rate through its influence on embryo quality. Therefore, fresh TESE has no added value when there is still cryopreserved testicular sperm available. Motile sperm is preferred for injection, but the use of tail touch sperm results in an acceptable treatment outcome.
Bibliography:istex:4B1105B90F8535A962F8BAADA167B3AFBACFC8BE
ark:/67375/WNG-0839GGWF-X
ArticleID:AOGS12769
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-6349
1600-0412
DOI:10.1111/aogs.12769