Combined Impella and Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Support to Improve Both Ventricular Unloading and Coronary Blood Flow for Myocardial Recovery: An Experimental Study

:  Some patients in need of hemodynamic support do not respond to intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy. Hemodynamic stability can then be obtained by a more potent cardiac assist device, like the Impella catheter pump. Whether additional IABP support additional to Impella support can provide mor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArtificial organs Vol. 31; no. 11; pp. 839 - 842
Main Authors Sauren, Loes D. C., Accord, Ryan E., Hamzeh, Khaled, De Jong, Monique, Van Der Nagel, Theo, Van Der Veen, Frederik H., Maessen, Jos G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.11.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary::  Some patients in need of hemodynamic support do not respond to intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy. Hemodynamic stability can then be obtained by a more potent cardiac assist device, like the Impella catheter pump. Whether additional IABP support additional to Impella support can provide more optimal hemodynamic myocardial conditions is examined in this study. Seven sheep were implemented with IABP and Impella. An acute myocardial infarction was induced. Hemodynamic performance was assessed during baseline, during Impella support and IABP support individually, and during the combined Impella plus IABP support. The Impella support provided a reduction of afterload with 30% and an increase of coronary artery flow with 47%. The IABP increased coronary artery flow (13%), carotid artery flow (16%), and aortic ascending blood pressure (6%); a similar (but stronger) effect was provided when using the IABP support additional to Impella support and, respectively, increases of 33, 21, and 19% were established. The oxygen demand–supply ratio decreased by 25% due to the extra use of the IABP. A combination of IABP and Impella provides the most optimal hemodynamic myocardial conditions compared to either stand‐alone support.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-HL9R25JN-D
istex:AB88549168A95022FB7997AD746EE4D35B666935
ArticleID:AOR477
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0160-564X
1525-1594
DOI:10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00477.x