Neuroendocrine differentiation and prognosis in breast adenocarcinoma

• Published in: Histopathology Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. 215 - 222
• Main Authors: Miremadi, A, Pinder, S E, Lee, A H S, Bell, J A, Paish, E C, Wencyk, P, Elston, C W, Nicholson, R I, Blamey, R W, Robertson, J F, Ellis, I O
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.03.2002; Blackwell
• Subjects: Adenocarcinoma - metabolism; Adenocarcinoma - pathology; Adult; Aged; Biological and medical sciences; breast; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; carcinoma; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine - metabolism; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine - pathology; Chromogranin A; Chromogranins - analysis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Mammary gland diseases; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; neuroendocrine; Phosphopyruvate Hydratase - analysis; Prognosis; Survival Analysis; Synaptophysin - analysis; Tumors; Human; Immunohistochemistry; Pathology; Mammary gland diseases; Carcinoma; Prognosis; Malignant tumor; Mammary gland; Cell differentiation; Neuroendocrine tumor
• ISSN: 0309-0167; 1365-2559
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.01336.x

Neuroendocrine differentiation and prognosis in breast adenocarcinoma Aims: Neuroendocrine differentiation has been detected, and its prognostic value studied, in a number of common human carcinomas. To date there are few detailed studies examining its relevance in breast carcinoma. In this study we evaluate the frequency and prognostic importance of neuroendocrine differentiation in breast adenocarcinoma. Methods and results: The presence of neuroendocrine differentiation, defined as positive reactivity for three markers, neuron‐specific enolase (NSE), chromogranin A and/or synaptophysin, has been evaluated in 99 patients with primary operable breast cancer using standard immunocytochemical techniques. A consecutive cohort of patients were selected from the Nottingham/Tenovus series. Comprehensive patient and tumour records have been maintained, and patients were followed up according to a defined protocol. Eighteen cases were positive for NSE, 10 for chromogranin A and 13 for synaptophysin. Eleven percent were positive with more than one neuroendocrine marker. No significant association was found between neuroendocrine differentiation and tumour size, grade, stage or the prevalence of vascular invasion. There was no significant difference in either overall or disease‐free survival between patients with or without neuroendocrine differentiation. Conclusions: In this study we confirm that neuroendocrine differentiation can be identified in a subset (10–18%) of human breast carcinomas. This phenomenon appears to have no relationship to established prognostic factors or patient outcome.