Improved interpretable machine learning emergency department triage tool addressing class imbalance

• Published in: Digital health Vol. 10; p. 20552076241240910
• Main Authors: Look, Clarisse Sj, Teixayavong, Salinelat, Djärv, Therese, Ho, Andrew Fw, Tan, Kenneth Bk, Ong, Marcus Eh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States SAGE Publishing 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Medicin och hälsovetenskap; emergency department; interpretable; triage; Machine learning
• ISSN: 2055-2076; 2055-2076
• DOI: 10.1177/20552076241240910

The Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP) is a novel mortality risk prediction score which leverages machine learning in supporting triage decisions. In its derivation study, SERP-2d, SERP-7d and SERP-30d demonstrated good predictive performance for 2-day, 7-day and 30-day mortality. However, the dataset used had significant class imbalance. This study aimed to determine if addressing class imbalance can improve SERP's performance, ultimately improving triage accuracy. The Singapore General Hospital (SGH) emergency department (ED) dataset was used, which contains 1,833,908 ED records between 2008 and 2020. Records between 2008 and 2017 were randomly split into a training set (80%) and validation set (20%). The 2019 and 2020 records were used as test sets. To address class imbalance, we used random oversampling and random undersampling in the AutoScore-Imbalance framework to develop SERP+-2d, SERP+-7d, and SERP+-30d scores. The performance of SERP+, SERP, and the commonly used triage risk scores was compared. The developed SERP+ scores had five to six variables. The AUC of SERP+ scores (0.874 to 0.905) was higher than that of the corresponding SERP scores (0.859 to 0.894) on both test sets. This superior performance was statistically significant for SERP+-7d (2019: Z = -5.843, p < 0.001, 2020: Z = -4.548, p < 0.001) and SERP+-30d (2019: Z = -3.063, p = 0.002, 2020: Z = -3.256, p = 0.001). SERP+ outperformed SERP marginally on sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, and positive predictive value measures. Negative predictive value was the same for SERP+ and SERP. Additionally, SERP+ showed better performance compared to the commonly used triage risk scores. Accounting for class imbalance during training improved score performance for SERP+. Better stratification of even a small number of patients can be meaningful in the context of the ED triage. Our findings reiterate the potential of machine learning-based scores like SERP+ in supporting accurate, data-driven triage decisions at the ED.