The molecular architecture of the yeast spindle pole body core determined by Bayesian integrative modeling

Microtubule-organizing centers (MTOCs) form, anchor, and stabilize the polarized network of microtubules in a cell. The central MTOC is the centrosome that duplicates during the cell cycle and assembles a bipolar spindle during mitosis to capture and segregate sister chromatids. Yet, despite their i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular biology of the cell Vol. 28; no. 23; pp. 3298 - 3314
Main Authors Viswanath, Shruthi, Bonomi, Massimiliano, Kim, Seung Joong, Klenchin, Vadim A, Taylor, Keenan C, Yabut, King C, Umbreit, Neil T, Van Epps, Heather A, Meehl, Janet, Jones, Michele H, Russel, Daniel, Velazquez-Muriel, Javier A, Winey, Mark, Rayment, Ivan, Davis, Trisha N, Sali, Andrej, Muller, Eric G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society for Cell Biology 07.11.2017
The American Society for Cell Biology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Microtubule-organizing centers (MTOCs) form, anchor, and stabilize the polarized network of microtubules in a cell. The central MTOC is the centrosome that duplicates during the cell cycle and assembles a bipolar spindle during mitosis to capture and segregate sister chromatids. Yet, despite their importance in cell biology, the physical structure of MTOCs is poorly understood. Here we determine the molecular architecture of the core of the yeast spindle pole body (SPB) by Bayesian integrative structure modeling based on in vivo fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS), x-ray crystallography, electron microscopy, and two-hybrid analysis. The model is validated by several methods that include a genetic analysis of the conserved PACT domain that recruits Spc110, a protein related to pericentrin, to the SPB. The model suggests that calmodulin can act as a protein cross-linker and Spc29 is an extended, flexible protein. The model led to the identification of a single, essential heptad in the coiled-coil of Spc110 and a minimal PACT domain. It also led to a proposed pathway for the integration of Spc110 into the SPB.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC5687031
Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
AC02-76SF00515; P01 GM105537; P41GM103393
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, 5110 MRB III, 465 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232
Present addresses: ‡Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705
ǁDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Pedi Oncology M662B, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston MA 02215
Author contributions: S.V., M.B., M.W., I.R., T.N.D., A.S., and E.G.M. designed the research. S.V. and M.B. performed the modeling. S.J.K., K.C.T., V.A.K., K.C.Y., N.T.U., H.A.V.E., J.M., M.H.J., D.R., T.N.D., and E.G.M. conducted the experiments. . V.A.K., M.W., I.R., T.N.D., and E.G.M. designed the experiments. S.V., M.B., S.J.K., H.A.V.E., J.M., J.AV-M., T.N.D., and E.G.M. analyzed the data. S.V., M.B., S.J.K., J.M., M.W., I.R., T.N.D., A.S., and E.G.M. wrote the paper.
Translational Research, Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021
ISSN:1059-1524
1939-4586
DOI:10.1091/mbc.E17-06-0397