Mitochondrial phylogeography of the moor frog, Rana arvalis

• Published in: Molecular ecology Vol. 13; no. 6; pp. 1469 - 1480
• Main Authors: Babik, W., Branicki, W., Sandera, M., Litvinchuk, S., Borkin, L. J., Irwin, J. T., Rafiński, J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.06.2004
• Subjects: Animals; Base Sequence; Carpathian Basin; Cluster Analysis; DNA Primers; DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics; eastern refugia; Environment; Europe; Evolution, Molecular; Genetic Variation; Geography; Haplotypes - genetics; Likelihood Functions; mitochondrial DNA; Models, Genetic; Molecular Sequence Data; nested clade analysis; Phylogeny; phylogeography; Population Dynamics; Rana arvalis; Ranidae - genetics; Ranidae - physiology; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Time Factors; Europe; Eurasia; PN, Arctic; Russia
• ISSN: 0962-1083; 1365-294X
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02157.x

The moor frog Rana arvalis is a lowland species with a broad Eurasiatic distribution, from arctic tundra through forest to the steppe zone. Its present‐day range suggests that glacial refugia of this frog were located outside southern European peninsulas. We studied the species‐wide phylogeographical pattern using sequence variation in a 682 base pairs fragment of mtDNA cytochrome b gene; 223 individuals from 73 localities were analysed. Two main clades, A and B, differing by c. 3.6% sequence divergence were detected. The A clade is further subdivided into two subclades, AI and AII differing by 1.0%. All three lineages are present in the Carpathian Basin (CB), whereas the rest of the species range, including huge expanses of Eurasian lowlands, are inhabited solely by the AI lineage. We infer that AII and B lineages survived several glacial cycles in the CB but did not expand, at least in the present interglacial, to the north. The geographical distribution and genealogical relationships between haplotypes from the AI lineage indicate that this group had two glacial refugia, one located in the eastern part of the CB and the other probably in southern Russia. Populations from both refugia contributed to the colonization of the western part of the range, whereas the eastern part was colonized from the eastern refugium only. The effective population size as evidenced by θML is an order of magnitude higher in the AI lineage than in the AII and B lineages. Demographic expansion was detected in all three lineages.