Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Dogs: Comparison Between Single Portal and Two-Portal Access
Objective: To compare surgical times and perioperative complication rates of single portal access and 2‐portal laparoscopic ovariectomy (LapOVE) in dogs using a bipolar vessel sealer/divider device, and to evaluate the performance of novice laparoscopists for right ovariectomy. Study Design: Control...
Saved in:
Published in | Veterinary surgery Vol. 38; no. 7; pp. 818 - 824 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.10.2009
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective: To compare surgical times and perioperative complication rates of single portal access and 2‐portal laparoscopic ovariectomy (LapOVE) in dogs using a bipolar vessel sealer/divider device, and to evaluate the performance of novice laparoscopists for right ovariectomy.
Study Design: Controlled clinical trial.
Animals: Female dogs (n=42).
Methods: Dogs were divided into groups: 1=single portal and 2=2 portal. LapOVE was performed using a 5 mm vessel sealer/divider device and a 10 mm operating laparoscope (Group 1) or a 5 mm laparoscope (Group 2). Dog characteristics (weight, body condition score, ovarian ligament fat score), operative time, and perioperative complication rate were compared between groups. Right ovariectomy duration was evaluated for 2 novice laparoscopists.
Results: No significant difference was found in mean total surgical time between group 1 (21.07 min/s) and group 2 (19.06 min/s). Factors significantly affecting times included body condition scores, ovarian ligament fat score, ovarian bleeding, and surgeon expertize. Minor complications (bleeding from ovaries or after splenic trauma) occurred and were similar in both groups. Bleeding was correlated to body condition score and ovarian ligament fat score. Interindividual differences were found among surgeons for right ovariectomy time.
Conclusions: Single portal access LapOVE using vessel sealer/divider device is feasible, safe, and does not significantly increase total surgical time in comparison with 2‐portal approach. Laparoscopic skills may play a role in ability to perform single portal LapOVE.
Clinical Relevance: LapOVE can be performed using single portal access. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:C7B926A5CD3F090B29B614FB6726217E3569A44A ark:/67375/WNG-9541PCVC-V ArticleID:VSU00601 Preliminary results were presented in part at the 5th Annual Meeting of the Veterinary Endoscopy Society, Keystone, CO, USA, March 2008. This project was realized at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayỳs University, 55139 Samsun, Turkey. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0161-3499 1532-950X |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00601.x |