Consumption of cyanobacteria by roach (Rutilus rutilus): useful or harmful to the fish?

• Published in: Freshwater biology Vol. 47; no. 2; pp. 243 - 250
• Main Authors: Kamjunke, Norbert, Schmidt, Katja, Pflugmacher, Stephan, Mehner, Thomas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.02.2002; Blackwell Science; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Agnatha. Pisces; Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animals; Aphanizomenon; Autoecology; Biological and medical sciences; cyanobacteria; Fresh water ecosystems; Freshwater; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Microcystis; roach; Rutilus rutilus; Synecology; Vertebrata; zooplankton; Europe; Germany; Motility; Growth rate; Toxicity; Interspecific comparison; Energy input; Experimental study; Microcystis; Young animal; Feeding; Freshwater environment; Toxin; Vertebrata; Microbial origin; Food intake; Rutilus rutilus; Pisces; Cyanobacteria; Lakes; Bacteria; Cyprinidae; Digestibility
• ISSN: 0046-5070; 1365-2427
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00800.x

1. The ability of roach to use cyanobacterial food is generally believed to be one reason for the dominance of roach over perch in eutrophic European lakes. The aim of this study was to test whether cyanobacteria really are a suitable food for juvenile roach. Special attention was paid to differences between the two cyanobacteria species Aphanizomenon and Microcystis which are common in eutrophic lakes and are ingested by roach there. 2. We performed growth and behaviour experiments with juvenile roach fed with zooplankton and the different cyanobacteria. Growth rate with Aphanizomenon was lower than with Daphnia but significantly higher than without food, whereas growth rate with Microcystis was as low as without food. 3. In cultivation experiments of roach faeces, Microcystis was found not to have been digested and grew exponentially after passing through the gut whereas Aphanizomenon stayed at low biomass. Differences in growth were not related to the toxin content of cyanobacteria. Investigations of roach motility showed no differences whether fed with Aphanizomenon or Microcystis. 4. In contrast to Microcystis, Aphanizomenon can be regarded as a suitable food source for juvenile roach probably because of its better digestability. We conclude that the ability to feed on cyanobacteria is not a general competitive advantage for roach, but the outcome depends on the species composition of the cyanobacteria.