Effects of Ultrasound, Laser and Exercises on Temporomandibular Joint Pain and Trismus Following Head and Neck Cancer

To compare the effects of low intensity ultrasound (LIUS), traditional exercise therapy (TET), low level laser therapy (LLLT) and TET on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain and trismus following recovery from head and neck cancer (HNC). Sixty participants following, who had experienced HNC, were rand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of rehabilitation medicine Vol. 42; no. 6; pp. 846 - 853
Main Authors Elgohary, Hany Mohamed, Eladl, Hadaya Mosaad, Soliman, Ashraf Hassan, Soliman, Elsadat Saad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 01.12.2018
대한재활의학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare the effects of low intensity ultrasound (LIUS), traditional exercise therapy (TET), low level laser therapy (LLLT) and TET on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain and trismus following recovery from head and neck cancer (HNC). Sixty participants following, who had experienced HNC, were randomly allocated to three groups of 20 people each. Each group received different therapy. Group A received LIUS and TET; group B received LLLT and TET; while group C received TET. All 60 participants were evaluated under the visual analog scale (VAS), the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL) and the Vernier caliper scale (VCS) at the beginning of the therapies and after 4 weeks. ANOVA test revealed significant improvements across all three groups with outcomes of p<0.05. The results of the UW-QOL questionnaire showed a significant difference between groups A, B and C in favor of group A (p<0.05). The VAS results showed a more improvement in group A as compared to group B (p<0.05), while there was no statistical difference between groups B and C (p>0.05). The VCS results showed more improvement for the individuals in group B as compared to those in group C (p<0.05), while there was minimal difference between groups A and B (p>0.05). The LIUS and TET are more effective than LLLT and/or TET in reducing TMJ pain and trismus following HNC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2234-0645
2234-0653
DOI:10.5535/arm.2018.42.6.846