Importance of the numerical schemes in the CFD of the human nose
Computational fluid dynamics of the air flow in the human nasal cavities, starting from patient-specific Computer Tomography (CT) scans, is an important tool for diagnostics and surgery planning. However, a complete and systematic assessment of the influence of the main modelling assumptions is stil...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of biomechanics Vol. 138; p. 111100 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Ltd
01.06.2022
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Computational fluid dynamics of the air flow in the human nasal cavities, starting from patient-specific Computer Tomography (CT) scans, is an important tool for diagnostics and surgery planning. However, a complete and systematic assessment of the influence of the main modelling assumptions is still lacking. In designing such simulations, choosing the discretization scheme, which is the main subject of the present work, is an often overlooked decision of primary importance. We use a comparison framework to quantify the effects of the major design choices. The reconstructed airways of a healthy, representative adult patient are used to set up a computational study where such effects are systematically measured. It is found that the choice of the numerical scheme is the most important aspect, although all varied parameters impact the solution noticeably. For a physiologically meaningful flow rate, changes of the global pressure drop up to more than 50% are observed; locally, velocity differences can become extremely significant. Our results call for an improved standard in the description of this type of numerical studies, where way too often the order of accuracy of the numerical scheme is not mentioned. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0021-9290 1873-2380 1873-2380 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111100 |