Combined effects of low-intensity blood flow restriction training and high-intensity resistance training on muscle strength and size

We investigated the combined effect of low-intensity blood flow restriction and high-intensity resistance training on muscle adaptation. Forty young men (aged 22–32 years) were randomly divided into four groups of ten subjects each: high-intensity resistance training (HI-RT, 75% of one repetition ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of applied physiology Vol. 111; no. 10; pp. 2525 - 2533
Main Authors Yasuda, Tomohiro, Ogasawara, Riki, Sakamaki, Mikako, Ozaki, Hayao, Sato, Yoshiaki, Abe, Takashi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.10.2011
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1439-6319
1439-6327
1439-6327
DOI10.1007/s00421-011-1873-8

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We investigated the combined effect of low-intensity blood flow restriction and high-intensity resistance training on muscle adaptation. Forty young men (aged 22–32 years) were randomly divided into four groups of ten subjects each: high-intensity resistance training (HI-RT, 75% of one repetition maximum [1-RM]), low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction (LI-BFR, 30% 1-RM), combined HI-RT and LI-BFR (CB-RT, twice-weekly LI-BFR and once-weekly HI-RT), and nontraining control (CON). Three training groups performed bench press exercises 3 days/week for 6 weeks. During LI-BFR training sessions, subjects wore pressure cuffs on both arms that were inflated to 100–160 mmHg. Increases in 1-RM were similar in the HI-RT (19.9%) and CB-RT (15.3%) groups and lower in the LI-BFR group (8.7%, p  < 0.05). Maximal isometric elbow extension (MVC) increased in the HI-RT (11.3%) and CB-RT (6.6%) groups; there was no change in the LI-BFR group (−0.2%). The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the triceps brachii (TB) increased ( p  < 0.05) in the HI-RT (8.6%), CB-RT (7.2%), and LI-BFR (4.4%) groups. The change in relative isometric strength (MVC divided by TB CSA) was greater ( p  < 0.05) in the HI-RT group (3.3%) than in the LI-BFR (−3.5%) and CON (−0.1%) groups. Following training, relative dynamic strength (1-RM divided by TB CSA) was increased ( p  < 0.05) by 10.5% in the HI-RT group and 6.7% in the CB-RT group. None of the variables in the CON group changed. Our results show that low-intensity resistance training with BFR-induced functional muscle adaptations is improved by combining it with HI-RT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1439-6319
1439-6327
1439-6327
DOI:10.1007/s00421-011-1873-8