Measurement of the Reflectivity of the Intima-Medial Layer of the Common Carotid Artery Improves the Discriminatory Value of Intima-Medial Thickness Measurement as a Predictor of Risk of Atherosclerotic Disease

• Published in: Ultrasound in medicine & biology Vol. 33; no. 7; pp. 1029 - 1038
• Main Authors: Ellis, Stephen M, Naoumova, Rossi P, Neuwirth, Clare K, Eckersley, Robert, Cosgrove, David O, Thompson, Gilbert R, Sidhu, Paul S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Inc 01.07.2007
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Arteries; Arteriosclerosis; Atherosclerosis - diagnostic imaging; Carotid; Carotid arteries; Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging; Cholesterol - blood; Endothelium, Vascular - diagnostic imaging; Female; Humans; Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II - diagnostic imaging; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Radiology; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Factors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tissue characterization; Tunica Intima - diagnostic imaging; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound (US); Carotid; Arteriosclerosis; Ultrasound (US); Arteries; Carotid arteries; US; Tissue characterization
• ISSN: 0301-5629; 1879-291X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.02.002

Abstract Our aim was to assess the predictive value of a measurement of intima-medial layer (IML) reflectivity in the differentiation of pathological from physiological increases in intima-medial thickness (IMT). Both common carotid arteries (CCA) of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients and age- and sex-matched controls (no cardiovascular risk factors) were imaged using a 10- to 15-MHz linear array transducer ( n = 30). Images of the CCA far wall were analyzed in the IMT “plug-in” of “HDI Lab.” The IML reflectivity, averaged over an 8- to 12-mm length of arterial wall, was expressed as a ratio of reflectivity at a point 0.21-mm deep to the intima-medial interface divided by the reflectivity at the intima-medial interface, termed the intima-medial reflectivity index (IMRI). The risk of atherosclerosis was assessed in terms of IMT alone and IMT coupled with IMRI. Defining high risk of atherosclerosis in FH, in terms of both IMT alone and IMT coupled with IMRI, produced an appropriate, when compared with cholesterol-years score, statistically significant stratification ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.005). Analysis of the low-risk subjects revealed a tendency to define a subject as “high risk” based on a physiological increase in IMT, but when IMRI is included in the assessment, all controls are correctly identified as low risk. This method of quantifying the reflectivity of the IML improved the discriminatory performance of IMT increase as an indicator of atherosclerotic risk by enabling a smaller, therefore earlier, increase in IMT to be considered pathologic when accompanied by an increase in IMRI. (E-mail: paul.sidhu@kch.nhs.uk )