Reliability of the Footscan® Platform System in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of without Top-Layer and with Top-Layer Protocols

• Published in: BioMed research international Vol. 2017; no. 2017; pp. 1 - 9
• Main Authors: Lei, Wei, Yang, Zhao, Shan, Lei, Huang, Lu-Yu, Wen, Xin-Xin, Xu, Chao, Yan, Ya-Bo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 01.01.2017; Hindawi; John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Subjects: Biomechanics; Coefficient of variation; Contact pressure; Correlation coefficients; Diagnostic equipment (Medical); Evaluation; Feet; Foot; Foot diseases; Health care; Mathematical analysis; Medical examination; Medical research; Orthopedics; Parameter identification; Peak pressure; Physical therapy; Plantar pressure; Posture; Practice guidelines (Medicine); Pressure; Pressure measurement; Preventive medicine; Reliability analysis; Researchers; Sports medicine; Studies; Ultrasonic testing; Walking; China
• ISSN: 2314-6133; 2314-6141; 2314-6141
• DOI: 10.1155/2017/2708712

The Footscan platform is a useful tool for plantar pressure measurement. However, there is still controversy over whether or not the platform should be covered by top-layer during the test. This study was designed to compare the reliability of the Footscan platform and identify the differences of the foot loading parameters between without top-layer (WOT) and with top-layer (WT) protocols. Measurements were taken from thirty-two healthy subjects. Participants were tested with a Footscan platform using the WOT and WT protocols. Three trials were performed during two separate testing sessions with a 7-day interval. Peak pressure, contact time, contact area, and pressure-time integral at ten foot zones were recorded and calculated for intra- and intersession reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CVs). The reliability and values of the analyzed parameters for the two protocols were compared. Both protocols produced a moderate to good level of intra- and intersession reliability. Compared with the WT protocol, the WOT protocol showed higher ICCs, lower CVs, and higher values in most of the parameters analyzed. The results suggest that the WOT protocol showed better reliability than the WT protocol. We recommend not using the top-layer when performing the plantar pressure test.