Comparison of MDRD, CKD-EPI, and Cockcroft-Gault equation in relation to measured glomerular filtration rate among a large cohort with diabetes

To analyze the performance of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Cockcroft-Gault (CG), and CG calculated with ideal bodyweight (CG-IBW) equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine in a large...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of diabetes and its complications Vol. 31; no. 9; pp. 1376 - 1383
Main Authors Schwandt, Anke, Denkinger, Michael, Fasching, Peter, Pfeifer, Martin, Wagner, Christian, Weiland, Jörg, Zeyfang, Andrej, Holl, Reinhard W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2017
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To analyze the performance of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Cockcroft-Gault (CG), and CG calculated with ideal bodyweight (CG-IBW) equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine in a large diabetic population. 24,516 adults with type-1-diabetes or type-2-diabetes from the multicenter diabetes prospective follow-up registry DPV were analyzed. We compared eGFR and measured GFR (mGFR) based on 24-h urine collection by calculating mean bias (difference), precision (SD of this difference), accuracy (proportion of eGFR within ±10% of mGFR), Bland-Altman-plots. CG overestimates, whereas MDRD, CKD-EPI, and CG-IBW underestimate. Smallest mean bias and highest accuracy (75.3%) were observed for MDRD compared to the other equations (p<0.0001). MDRD and CKD-EPI estimated most accurately in stages 1 (MDRD:57.7%, CKD-EPI:57.3%) and 2 (MDRD:80.2%, CKD-EPI:80.7%). In stages 3 to 5, highest accuracy was observed for the MDRD (stage 3:82.3%, stage 4:77.8%, stage 5:71.0%). Among younger subjects, accuracy was higher using the CKD-EPI (18–<40years:63.7%, 40–<60years:72.8%). Above age 60years, MDRD estimated most accurately (60–<70years:77.3%, ≥70years:78.8%). In males and females, MDRD estimated most accurately (males:75.3%, females:75.3%). In this large diabetic cohort, smallest bias and highest accuracy were observed for the MDRD.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1056-8727
1873-460X
1873-460X
DOI:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.06.016