Comparison of MDRD, CKD-EPI, and Cockcroft-Gault equation in relation to measured glomerular filtration rate among a large cohort with diabetes
To analyze the performance of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Cockcroft-Gault (CG), and CG calculated with ideal bodyweight (CG-IBW) equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine in a large...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of diabetes and its complications Vol. 31; no. 9; pp. 1376 - 1383 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.09.2017
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To analyze the performance of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Cockcroft-Gault (CG), and CG calculated with ideal bodyweight (CG-IBW) equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine in a large diabetic population.
24,516 adults with type-1-diabetes or type-2-diabetes from the multicenter diabetes prospective follow-up registry DPV were analyzed. We compared eGFR and measured GFR (mGFR) based on 24-h urine collection by calculating mean bias (difference), precision (SD of this difference), accuracy (proportion of eGFR within ±10% of mGFR), Bland-Altman-plots.
CG overestimates, whereas MDRD, CKD-EPI, and CG-IBW underestimate. Smallest mean bias and highest accuracy (75.3%) were observed for MDRD compared to the other equations (p<0.0001). MDRD and CKD-EPI estimated most accurately in stages 1 (MDRD:57.7%, CKD-EPI:57.3%) and 2 (MDRD:80.2%, CKD-EPI:80.7%). In stages 3 to 5, highest accuracy was observed for the MDRD (stage 3:82.3%, stage 4:77.8%, stage 5:71.0%). Among younger subjects, accuracy was higher using the CKD-EPI (18–<40years:63.7%, 40–<60years:72.8%). Above age 60years, MDRD estimated most accurately (60–<70years:77.3%, ≥70years:78.8%). In males and females, MDRD estimated most accurately (males:75.3%, females:75.3%).
In this large diabetic cohort, smallest bias and highest accuracy were observed for the MDRD. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1056-8727 1873-460X 1873-460X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.06.016 |