Oncology-specific radiation dose and image noise reference levels in adult abdominal-pelvic CT

• Published in: Clinical imaging Vol. 93; pp. 52 - 59
• Main Authors: Ahmad, Moiz, Liu, Xinming, Morani, Ajaykumar C., Ganeshan, Dhakshinamoorthy, Anderson, Marcus R., Samei, Ehsan, Jensen, Corey T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.01.2023; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Abdomen; Abdomen - diagnostic imaging; Adult; Algorithms; Automation; Computed tomography; Diagnostic reference levels; Dosimetry; Humans; Image acquisition; Image contrast; Image enhancement; Image noise; Image quality; Indication; Medical imaging; Monitoring systems; Noise; Oncology; Patients; Pelvis; Pelvis - diagnostic imaging; Radiation; Radiation Dosage; Radiation reduction; Radiography, Abdominal - methods; Scanners; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Image noise; CT; Oncology; Diagnostic reference levels; Radiation reduction
• ISSN: 0899-7071; 1873-4499
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.10.016

To provide our oncology-specific adult abdominal-pelvic CT reference levels for image noise and radiation dose from a high-volume, oncologic, tertiary referral center. The portal venous phase abdomen-pelvis acquisition was assessed for image noise and radiation dose in 13,320 contrast-enhanced CT examinations. Patient size (effective diameter) and radiation dose (CTDIvol) were recorded using a commercial software system, and image noise (Global Noise metric) was quantified using a custom processing system. The reference level and range for dose and noise were calculated for the full dataset, and for examinations grouped by CT scanner model. Dose and noise reference levels were also calculated for exams grouped by five different patient size categories. The noise reference level was 11.25 HU with a reference range of 10.25–12.25 HU. The dose reference level at a median effective diameter of 30.7 cm was 26.7 mGy with a reference range of 19.6–37.0 mGy. Dose increased with patient size; however, image noise remained approximately constant within the noise reference range. The doses were 2.1–2.5 times than the doses in the ACR DIR registry for corresponding patient sizes. The image noise was 0.63–0.75 times the previously published reference level in abdominal-pelvic CT examinations. Our oncology-specific abdominal-pelvic CT dose reference levels are higher than in the ACR dose index registry and our oncology-specific image noise reference levels are lower than previously proposed image noise reference levels. This study reports reference image noise and radiation dose levels appropriate for the indication of abdomen-pelvis CT examination for cancer diagnosis and staging. The difference in these reference levels from non-oncology-specific CT examinations highlight a need for indication-specific, dose index and image quality reference registries. •Oncology-specific adult abdominal-pelvic CT image noise reference levels are lower than previously reported reference levels.•Oncology-specific adult abdominal-pelvic CT dose reference levels are higher than those in the ACR dose index registry.•There is a need for indication-specific, multi-center dose index and image quality reference level registries.