Saxagliptin is non-inferior to glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin alone: a 52-week randomised controlled trial

Summary Aim:  To assess the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin vs. glipizide as add‐on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone. Methods and patients:  A total of 858 patients [age ≥ 18 years; glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of clinical practice (Esher) Vol. 64; no. 12; pp. 1619 - 1631
Main Authors Göke, B., Gallwitz, B., Eriksson, J., Hellqvist, Å., Gause-Nilsson, I.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2010
Wiley-Blackwell
Hindawi Limited
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Aim:  To assess the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin vs. glipizide as add‐on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone. Methods and patients:  A total of 858 patients [age ≥ 18 years; glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) > 6.5 – 10.0%; on stable metformin doses ≥ 1500 mg/day] were randomised 1 : 1 to saxagliptin 5 mg/day or glipizide up‐titrated as needed from 5 to 20 mg/day for 52 weeks. The primary objective was to assess if the change from baseline HbA1c achieved with saxagliptin plus metformin was non‐inferior to glipizide plus metformin. Results:  The per‐protocol analysis demonstrated non‐inferiority of saxagliptin vs. glipizide; adjusted mean changes from baseline HbA1c were −0.74% vs. −0.80%, respectively; the between‐group difference was 0.06% (95% CI, −0.05% to 0.16%). Treatment with saxagliptin vs. glipizide was associated with a significantly smaller proportion of patients with hypoglycaemic events (3.0% vs. 36.3%; p < 0.0001) and a divergent impact on body weight (adjusted mean change from baseline −1.1 kg with saxagliptin vs. 1.1 kg with glipizide; p < 0.0001). There was a significantly smaller rise in HbA1c (%/week) from week 24 to 52 with saxagliptin vs. glipizide (0.001% vs. 0.004%; p = 0.04) indicating a sustained glycaemic effect beyond week 24. Excluding hypoglycaemic events, the proportion of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs) was similar (60.0% saxagliptin vs. 56.7% glipizide); treatment‐related AEs were less common with saxagliptin vs. glipizide (9.8% vs. 31.2%), attributable to the higher frequency of hypoglycaemia in glipizide patients. Discontinuation rates resulting from AEs were similar (∼4%). Conclusion:  Saxagliptin plus metformin was well tolerated, provided a sustained HbA1c reduction over 52 weeks, and was non‐inferior to glipizide plus metformin, with reduced body weight and a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia.
Bibliography:ArticleID:IJCP2510
ark:/67375/WNG-7H8W74L9-2
istex:691609786C5316CBD911345671F4BA546829721A
Disclosures
The D1680C00001 Investigators are listed in the
Dr Göke declares that he has served on an advisory board for AstraZeneca and received honoraria for speaking engagements with AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis and Novo Nordisk. Dr Gallwitz has served on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Merck & Co., Inc., Hoffman‐La Roche Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceutical, and received honoraria for speaking engagements from these companies. Dr Eriksson has been an investigator or received honoraria for speaking engagements with AstraZeneca, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Hoffman‐La Roche Inc., and sanofi‐aventis. Åsa Hellqvist, MSc and Dr Gause‐Nilsson are employees of AstraZeneca Research & Development.
Appendix
.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1368-5031
1742-1241
DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02510.x