Impact of Left Ventricular Chamber Size on Outcome in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

• Published in: International Heart Journal Vol. 63; no. 1; pp. 62 - 72
• Main Authors: Ogawa, Shou, Nagatomo, Yuji, Takei, Makoto, Saji, Mike, Goda, Ayumi, Kohno, Takashi, Nakano, Shintaro, Nishihata, Yosuke, Ikegami, Yukinori, Shoji, Satoshi, Shiraishi, Yasuyuki, Kohsaka, Shun, Yoshikawa, Tsutomu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Japan International Heart Journal Association 01.01.2022; Japan Science and Technology Agency
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body mass index; Congestive heart failure; Diastolic dysfunction; Echocardiography; Ejection fraction; Etiology; Female; Frailty; Heart failure; Heart Failure - complications; Heart Failure - mortality; Heart Failure - pathology; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging; Heart Ventricles - pathology; Hospitalization; Humans; Japan; Male; Mitral regurgitation; Mortality; Nutritional status; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patients; Phenotypes; Prognosis; Registries; Regurgitation; Sarcopenia; Stroke Volume; Ventricle; Japan; Mitral regurgitation; Diastolic dysfunction; Frailty
• ISSN: 1349-2365; 1349-3299
• DOI: 10.1536/ihj.21-486

Although heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has a highly variable phenotype, heterogeneity in left ventricular chamber size (LVCS) and its association with long-term outcome have not been thoroughly investigated. The present study sought to determine the impact of LVCS on clinical outcome in HFpEF.A total of 1505 consecutive HFpEF patients admitted to hospitals in the multicenter WET-HF Registry for acute decompensated HF (ADHF) between 2006 and 2017 were analyzed. The patients (age: 80 [73-86], male: 48%) were divided into larger (L) or smaller (S) LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) groups by the median value 45 mm.Younger age, male sex, higher body mass index, more favorable nutritional status, valvular etiology, and lower LVEF were associated with larger LVEDD. After propensity matching (399 pairs), the L group showed a larger left atrial diameter, E/e', and tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient and greater severity of mitral regurgitation. The L group had a higher rate of composite endpoint of all-cause death and ADHF re-admission (P = 0.021) and was an independent predictor. On the other hand, in the pre-matched cohort, the S group rather showed higher in-hospital (4% versus 2%. P = 0.004) and post-discharge mortality (P = 0.009).In HFpEF, LVCS was affected by demographic and cardiac parameters. After adjustment for demographic parameters, larger LVCS was associated with worse clinical outcome. Higher mortality in the S group in the pre-matched cohort might be related to the demographic factors suggesting frailty and/or sarcopenia.