Quality Assessment of Surface Current Fields From TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X Along-Track Interferometry and Doppler Centroid Analysis

All existing examples of current measurements by spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) along-track (AT) interferometry (ATI) have suffered from short baselines and corresponding low sensitivities. Theoretically, the best data quality at X-band is expected at effective baselines on the order of 3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing Vol. 52; no. 5; pp. 2759 - 2772
Main Authors Romeiser, Roland, Runge, Hartmut, Suchandt, Steffen, Kahle, Ralph, Rossi, Cristian, Bell, Paul S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY IEEE 01.05.2014
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:All existing examples of current measurements by spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) along-track (AT) interferometry (ATI) have suffered from short baselines and corresponding low sensitivities. Theoretically, the best data quality at X-band is expected at effective baselines on the order of 30 m, i.e., 30 times as long as the baselines of the divided-antenna modes of TerraSAR-X. In early 2012, we had a first opportunity to obtain data at near-optimum baselines from the TanDEM-X satellite formation. In this paper, we analyze two TanDEM-X interferograms acquired over the Pentland Firth (Scotland) with effective AT baselines of 25 and 40 m. For comparison, we consider a TerraSAR-X dual-receive-antenna (DRA)-mode interferogram with an effective baseline of 1.15 m, as well as velocity fields obtained by Doppler centroid analysis (DCA) of single-antenna data from the same three scenes. We show that currents derived from the TanDEM-X interferograms have a residual noise level of 0.1 m/s at an effective resolution of about 33 m × 33 m, while DRA-mode data must be averaged over 1000 m × 1000 m to reach the same level of accuracy. A comparison with reference currents from a 1-km resolution numerical tide computation system shows good agreement in all three cases. The DCA-based currents are found to be less accurate than the ATI-based ones but close to short-baseline ATI results in quality. We conclude that DCA is a considerable alternative to divided-antenna mode ATI, while our TanDEM-X results demonstrate the true potential of the ATI technique at near-optimum baselines.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0196-2892
1558-0644
DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2013.2265659