A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus

Cells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division, especially during episodes of DNA damage. The paradigm for cell division control following DNA damage in bacteria involves the SOS response where cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA induces a division inhibitor. However, in Cauloba...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPLoS biology Vol. 12; no. 10; p. e1001977
Main Authors Modell, Joshua W, Kambara, Tracy K, Perchuk, Barrett S, Laub, Michael T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 01.10.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division, especially during episodes of DNA damage. The paradigm for cell division control following DNA damage in bacteria involves the SOS response where cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA induces a division inhibitor. However, in Caulobacter crescentus, cells lacking the primary SOS-regulated inhibitor, sidA, can often still delay division post-damage. Here we identify didA, a second cell division inhibitor that is induced by DNA damage, but in an SOS-independent manner. Together, DidA and SidA inhibit division, such that cells lacking both inhibitors divide prematurely following DNA damage, with lethal consequences. We show that DidA does not disrupt assembly of the division machinery and instead binds the essential division protein FtsN to block cytokinesis. Intriguingly, mutations in FtsW and FtsI, which drive the synthesis of septal cell wall material, can suppress the activity of both SidA and DidA, likely by causing the FtsW/I/N complex to hyperactively initiate cell division. Finally, we identify a transcription factor, DriD, that drives the SOS-independent transcription of didA following DNA damage.
Bibliography:The author(s) have made the following declarations about their contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: JWM MTL. Performed the experiments: JWM TKK BSP. Analyzed the data: JWM MTL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JWM MTL. Wrote the paper: JWM MTL.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1545-7885
1544-9173
1545-7885
DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001977