Using telomeric length measurements and methylation to understand the karyotype diversification of Ctenomys minutus (a small fossorial mammal)

• Published in: Genome Vol. 65; no. 11; pp. 1 - 572
• Main Authors: Matzenbacher, C.A, Da Silva, J, Garcia, A.L.H, Kretschmer, R, Cappetta, M, de Oliveira, E.H.C, de Freitas, T.R.O
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ottawa NRC Research Press 01.11.2022; Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press
• Subjects: Accumulation; Analysis; Chromosome 1; Chromosome rearrangements; Chromosomes; Ctenomys; Ctenomys minutus; Deoxyribonucleic acid; Diploids; DNA; DNA methylation; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Karyotypes; Methods; Methylation; Telomeres; Variation; Brazil
• ISSN: 0831-2796; 1480-3321
• DOI: 10.1139/gen-2022-0018

The genus Ctenomys has been widely used in karyotype evolution studies due to the variation in their diploid numbers. Ctenomys minutus is characterized by intraspecific variation in diploid number (2n = 42, 46, 48, and 50), which makes it an interesting model to investigate genomic rearrangements mechanisms that could lead to different cytotypes in this species. Thereupon, it has been already shown that DNA methylation may participate in chromosome structure. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether telomeres and global DNA methylation had a role in the genome rearrangements that led to this variation in C. minutus. We also realized an analysis for the presence of intrachromosomal telomeric repeats (ITRs) by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Our study demonstrated that neither telomere length nor DNA methylation had significant differences among the cytotypes. However, if only females were considered, there were significant differences for telomere length and methylation. Young individuals, regardless of their cytotypes, had the most methylated DNA. Regarding the ITRs, we found a signal on chromosome 1 in 2n = 50b. No evidence was found that telomere length or methylation could have influenced chromosomal rearrangements, although new cytotypes seem to have emerged within the distribution of parental cytotypes by the accumulation of different chromosomal rearrangements.