Excessive waitlists and delays to treatment with low-dose-rate brachytherapy predict an increased risk of recurrence and metastases in intermediate-risk prostatic carcinoma

•Resource constraints have led to prolonged wait-times for prostate brachytherapy.•Increased wait times predict a significant increase in recurrence and metastases.•Better resource planning is needed to reduce management delays & improve outcomes. It has previously been shown that increased wait...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and translational radiation oncology Vol. 30; pp. 38 - 42
Main Authors Khanolkar, Rutvij A., Quon, Harvey, Thind, Kundan, Sia, Michael, Roumeliotis, Michael, Husain, Siraj, McGeachy, Philip, Meyer, Tyler, Martell, Kevin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.09.2021
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Resource constraints have led to prolonged wait-times for prostate brachytherapy.•Increased wait times predict a significant increase in recurrence and metastases.•Better resource planning is needed to reduce management delays & improve outcomes. It has previously been shown that increased wait times for prostatectomy are associated with poorer outcomes in intermediate-risk prostatic carcinoma (PCa). However, the impact of wait times on PCa outcomes following low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) are unknown. We retrospectively reviewed 466 intermediate-risk PCa patients that underwent LDR-BT at a single comprehensive cancer center between 2003 and 2016. Wait times were defined as the time from biopsy to LDR-BT. The association of wait times with outcomes was evaluated using Cox and Fine-Gray regression in both univariate and multivariate models. Median (interquartile range) follow-up and wait time for all patients were 8.1 (6.3–10.4) years and 5.1 (3.9–6.9) months, respectively. Among NCCN unfavourable intermediate-risk (UIR) patients (n = 170; 36%), increased wait times predicted both a greater cumulative incidence of recurrence [MHR = 1.01/month of wait time (95% CI: 1.00–1.03); P = 0.044] and metastases [MHR = 1.04/month of wait time (95% CI: 1.02–1.06); P < 0.001] in multivariate modeling. In NCCN favourable intermediate-risk (FIR) patients, there was no significant association between wait time and recurrence or metastases risk. Among all intermediate-risk patients, wait time was associated with an increase in the incidence of metastases [MHR = 1.03/month of wait time (95% CI: 1.02–1.05); P < 0.001], but not recurrence in multivariate models. There was no association between wait time and overall survival in the UIR, FIR, or all intermediate-risk cohorts. Resource constraints within this center’s public healthcare system have contributed to waitlists exceeding 5-months in length. This study finds that patients with UIR PCa experience a 1% increase in the risk of recurrence and 4% increase in the risk of metastases with each additional month of delay in definitive disease management. Preventing such extended management delays in LDR-BT may improve disease-related outcomes in patients with PCa.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2405-6308
2405-6308
DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2021.06.008