Japan Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion for the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair tumors, cooperated by Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, First Edition

• Published in: International journal of clinical oncology Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 217 - 239
• Main Authors: Mishima, Saori, Taniguchi, Hiroya, Akagi, Kiwamu, Baba, Eishi, Fujiwara, Yutaka, Hirasawa, Akira, Ikeda, Masafumi, Maeda, Osamu, Muro, Kei, Nishihara, Hiroshi, Nishiyama, Hiroyki, Takano, Tadao, Tsuchihara, Katsuya, Yatabe, Yasushi, Kodera, Yasuhiro, Yoshino, Takayuki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Singapore Springer Singapore 01.02.2020; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Cancer Research; Clinical trials; DNA repair; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mismatch repair; Oncology; Patients; PD-1 protein; Solid tumors; Special; Special Article; Surgical Oncology; Survival; Tumors; Japan; dMMR; Provisional clinical opinion; Mismatch repair-deficient advanced solid tumor; MSI-H; PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor
• ISSN: 1341-9625; 1437-7772
• DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01498-8

Background Novel therapeutic agents have improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumors. In parallel, the development of predictive biomarkers to identify patients who are likely to benefit from a certain treatment has also contributed to the improvement of survival. Recently, clinical trials have reported the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors. In Japan, a PD-1 inhibitor for dMMR advanced solid tumors, regardless of the primary tumor site, has been approved. However, there are some issues related to administering immune checkpoint inhibitors in the clinical practice setting, making it necessary to develop the guidelines. Methods Clinical questions (CQs) regarding medical care were formulated for patients with dMMR advanced solid tumors, and evidence to the CQs was collected by manual search to prepare recommendations. Then, the committee members voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other factors. Results The current guideline, which we consider a provisional clinical opinion at this point, describes the 11 requirements to be considered in terms of patients for whom dMMR testing is recommended, the timing and methods of dMMR testing, and clinical care systems required to perform dMMR testing properly and to administer immune checkpoint inhibitors safely. Conclusion This provisional clinical opinion proposes the requirements for performing dMMR testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors and administering them safely.