Blood propofol concentration and psychomotor effects on driving skills

We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of anaesthesia : BJA Vol. 85; no. 3; pp. 396 - 400
Main Authors Grant, S.A., Murdoch, J., Millar, K., Kenny, G.N.C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2000
Oxford University Press
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-0912
1471-6771
DOI10.1093/bja/85.3.396

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 μg ml−1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P<0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 μg ml−1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 μg ml−1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml−1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml−1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers.
AbstractList We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 μg ml−1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P<0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 μg ml−1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 μg ml−1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml−1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml−1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers.
We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target‐controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within‐list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 µg ml–1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P<0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 µg ml–1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within‐list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 µg ml–1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml–1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml–1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 396–400
We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 microgram ml-1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P < 0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml-1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml-1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers.
We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 microgram ml-1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P < 0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml-1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml-1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers.We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 microgram ml-1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P < 0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml-1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml-1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers.
We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target‐controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within‐list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 µg ml–1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P<0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 µg ml–1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within‐list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 µg ml–1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml–1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml–1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 396–400
Author Murdoch, J.
Kenny, G. N. C.
Millar, K.
Grant, S. A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: S.A.
  surname: Grant
  fullname: Grant, S.A.
  organization: Glasgow University Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary, 8–16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
– sequence: 2
  givenname: J.
  surname: Murdoch
  fullname: Murdoch, J.
  organization: Glasgow University Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary, 8–16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: K.
  surname: Millar
  fullname: Millar, K.
  organization: University Department of Psychological Medicine, Division of Behavioral Sciences, Academic Centre, Gartnaval Royal Hospital, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0XH, UK
– sequence: 4
  givenname: G.N.C.
  surname: Kenny
  fullname: Kenny, G.N.C.
  organization: Glasgow University Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary, 8–16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1482801$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11103180$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqF0kFvFCEUB3Biauy2evNsJsboxdk-hmGAo1brmjRqUk1ML4QBRtmysMJMY7-9tLPWpGniicP7PXh5fw7QXojBIvQUwxKDIEf9Wh1xuiRLIroHaIFbhuuOMbyHFgDAahC42UcHOa8BMGsEfYT2McZAMIcFOnnrYzTVNsVtHKKvdAzahjGp0cVQqVBK-Ur_jJs4xlTZYbB6zFUpmeQuXfhR5QvnfX6MHg7KZ_tkdx6ibyfvvx6v6tPPHz4evzmtdSv4WBMxlPl6rJXpodWtbUk_GAZgW9pQMMa2TAnGm75vtO54TxkQLnoDyhJBFDlEL-d7y8C_JptHuXFZW-9VsHHKkjUtYYC7Ap_fges4pVBmk1gwQShjtKBnOzT1G2vkNrmNSlfy73oKeLEDKmvlh6SCdvmfa3nDARfWzEynmHOyg9RuvNlgWaTzEoO8jkqWqCSnksgSVWl6fafp9tr7-auZx2n7P1nP0uXR_r61Kl3IjhFG5er7uVyRsy_w7uyTPC--m70twV06m2TWzpZvYFwqaUsT3f0P_QFIscL_
CODEN BJANAD
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_20552076241293597
crossref_primary_10_4103_sja_sja_196_21
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jopan_2016_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1177_0310057X1604400602
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03018752
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_012_2483_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10877_019_00355_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_006_0109_7
crossref_primary_10_23736_S0375_9393_17_12450_8
crossref_primary_10_1002_pds_546
crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2044_2001_02086_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0b013e328331d498
crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_12035
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2025_01_034
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2011_08_020
crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e3181609531
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_023_02122_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03021599
crossref_primary_10_5946_ce_2020_138
Cites_doi 10.1093/bja/71.5.633
10.1097/00000542-197509000-00003
10.1007/BF03004827
10.1093/bja/59.8.970
10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00434.x
10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03518.x
10.1093/bja/85.3.401
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2000 British Journal of Anaesthesia
2000
2000 INIST-CNRS
Copyright British Medical Association Sep 2000
Copyright_xml – notice: 2000 British Journal of Anaesthesia
– notice: 2000
– notice: 2000 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright British Medical Association Sep 2000
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1093/bja/85.3.396
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
Istex
CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1471-6771
EndPage 400
ExternalDocumentID 60010678
11103180
1482801
10_1093_bja_85_3_396
10.1093/bja/85.3.396
ark_67375_HXZ_H3SP0DSN_Z
S0007091217376614
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-E4
.2P
.55
.GJ
.I3
.XZ
.ZR
18M
1TH
23N
2WC
354
3O-
4.4
482
48X
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
5WA
6.Y
6I.
6PF
70D
AACTN
AAEDW
AAESY
AAFTH
AAIAV
AAIYJ
AAJKP
AALRI
AAMVS
AAOGV
AAPNW
AAPXW
AAQQT
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAWTL
AAXUO
ABEUO
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABKDP
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABNKS
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABQTQ
ABSMQ
ABVKL
ABXVV
ABZBJ
ACCJX
ACFRR
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACMRT
ACPQN
ACUFI
ACUTJ
ACUTO
ADBBV
ADEYI
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADJQC
ADOCK
ADORX
ADQLU
ADRIX
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEJOX
AEKPW
AEMDU
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AEWNT
AFFNX
AFIYH
AFOSN
AFTJW
AFXEN
AGKEF
AGKRT
AGSYK
AHMBA
AHPSJ
AHXPO
AI.
AIAGR
AIJHB
AITUG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
AMRAJ
APIBT
APWMN
ASPBG
AVWKF
AWCFO
AXUDD
AZFZN
BAWUL
BEYMZ
BGYMP
BHONS
BVRKM
BZKNY
C1A
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
CZ4
DIK
DILTD
DU5
D~K
E3Z
EBS
EE~
EJD
F5P
F9B
FDB
FEDTE
GX1
H5~
HAR
HVGLF
HW0
HZ~
IH2
IOX
J21
J5H
KAQDR
KC5
KOP
KQ8
KSI
KSN
L7B
M-Z
M41
M49
N9A
NCXOZ
NGC
NTWIH
NU-
O0~
OAWHX
OHH
OJQWA
OJZSN
OK1
OVD
O~Y
P2P
PB-
PEELM
PQQKQ
Q1.
Q5Y
R44
RD5
RHF
RNI
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RW1
RXO
RZF
RZO
SSZ
TEORI
TJX
TMA
TR2
VH1
W2D
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7H
X7M
YHG
ZA5
ZGI
ZKX
ZXP
~91
AAFWJ
AAYWO
ABEJV
ABGNP
ABNGD
ACUKT
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADVLN
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AIGII
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
BSCLL
EFKBS
0SF
0R~
AAYXX
ACVCV
AEHUL
AFETI
AFSHK
AGMDO
APJGH
APXCP
CITATION
H13
P0W
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-39f147b1cadb04c4e43bfd700e45250dde47a9782bb2cc68b570389bd0ae393a3
ISSN 0007-0912
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 08:19:48 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 07:08:44 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:35:10 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:12:45 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:37 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:00:47 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 28 03:19:57 EDT 2024
Tue Aug 05 16:50:45 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:34:56 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords anaesthetics i.v., propofol
recovery
recovery; anaesthetics i.v., propofol
Human
General anesthetic
Healthy subject
Activity concentration relation
Memory
Cognition
Propofol
Psychomotricity
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0
CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c498t-39f147b1cadb04c4e43bfd700e45250dde47a9782bb2cc68b570389bd0ae393a3
Notes istex:4E8CD56B8F2490A3873D468803322012AF1754FA
ark:/67375/HXZ-H3SP0DSN-Z
Accepted for publication: March 30, 2000
local:aed049
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/85.3.396
PMID 11103180
PQID 197935775
PQPubID 41750
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_72437016
proquest_journals_197935775
pubmed_primary_11103180
pascalfrancis_primary_1482801
crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_bja_85_3_396
crossref_primary_10_1093_bja_85_3_396
oup_primary_10_1093_bja_85_3_396
istex_primary_ark_67375_HXZ_H3SP0DSN_Z
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1093_bja_85_3_396
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2000-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2000-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2000
  text: 2000-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Oxford
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford
– name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
PublicationTitleAbbrev Br. J. Anaesth
PublicationTitleAlternate Br. J. Anaesth
PublicationYear 2000
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Oxford University Press
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
– name: Oxford University Press
– name: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
References Moss, Hindmarch, Pan, Edmondson (bib7) 1987; 59
Flatt, Birrell, Hobbes (bib11) 1984; 12
Munglani, Andrade, Sapsford, Baddeley, Jones (bib8) 1993; 71
Millar (bib6) 1992
Grant, Millar, Kenny (bib3) 2000; 85
Millar, Finnigan, Hammersley (bib9) 1999; 70
Kortilla, Linnola, Ertama, Hakkinen (bib2) 1975; 43
Tiplady (bib10) 1991
Whitehead, Sanders, Oldroyd (bib1) 1994; 49
Steward (bib4) 1975; 22
Hope, Woolman, Gray, Asbury, Millar (bib5) 1998; 53
Steward (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib4) 1975; 22
Tiplady (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib10) 1991
Kortilla (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib2) 1975; 43
Munglani (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib8) 1993; 71
Whitehead (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib1) 1994; 49
Grant (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib3) 2000; 85
Millar (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib9) 1999; 70
Millar (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib6) 1992
Moss (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib7) 1987; 59
Hope (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib5) 1998; 53
Flatt (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib11) 1984; 12
References_xml – start-page: 337
  year: 1992
  end-page: 385
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Effects of anaesthetic and analgesic drugs
  publication-title: Handbook of Human Performance
– volume: 71
  start-page: 633
  year: 1993
  end-page: 641
  ident: bib8
  article-title: A measure of consciousness and memory during isoflurane administration: the coherent frequency
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
– volume: 85
  start-page: 401
  year: 2000
  end-page: 406
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Blood alcohol concentration and psychomotor effects
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
– volume: 12
  start-page: 315
  year: 1984
  end-page: 324
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Effects of anesthesia on some aspects of mental functioning of surgical patients
  publication-title: Anesth Crit Care
– volume: 43
  start-page: 291
  year: 1975
  end-page: 299
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Recovery and simulated driving after intravenous anaesthesia with thiopental, methohexital, propanidid or alphadione
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
– volume: 22
  start-page: 111
  year: 1975
  end-page: 113
  ident: bib4
  article-title: A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room
  publication-title: Can Anaesth Soc J
– volume: 53
  start-page: 545
  year: 1998
  end-page: 550
  ident: bib5
  article-title: A system for psychomotor evaluation; design, implementation and practice effects in volunteers
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
– volume: 70
  start-page: 124
  year: 1999
  end-page: 130
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Is residual impairment after alcohol an effect of repeated performance?
  publication-title: Aviat Space Env Med
– volume: 59
  start-page: 970
  year: 1987
  end-page: 977
  ident: bib7
  article-title: A comparison of recovery after halothane and alfentanil after minor surgery
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
– volume: 49
  start-page: 490
  year: 1994
  end-page: 496
  ident: bib1
  article-title: The subjective effects of low-dose propofol. A double-blind study to evaluate dimensions of sedation and cosnsciousness with low-dose propofol
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
– start-page: 26
  year: 1991
  end-page: 37
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Alcohol as a comparator
  publication-title: Ambulatory Anaesthesia and Sedation: Impairment and Recovery
– volume: 71
  start-page: 633
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib8
  article-title: A measure of consciousness and memory during isoflurane administration: the coherent frequency
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/71.5.633
– volume: 12
  start-page: 315
  year: 1984
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib11
  article-title: Effects of anesthesia on some aspects of mental functioning of surgical patients
  publication-title: Anesth Crit Care
– volume: 43
  start-page: 291
  year: 1975
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib2
  article-title: Recovery and simulated driving after intravenous anaesthesia with thiopental, methohexital, propanidid or alphadione
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-197509000-00003
– volume: 22
  start-page: 111
  year: 1975
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib4
  article-title: A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room
  publication-title: Can Anaesth Soc J
  doi: 10.1007/BF03004827
– volume: 59
  start-page: 970
  year: 1987
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib7
  article-title: A comparison of recovery after halothane and alfentanil after minor surgery
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/59.8.970
– start-page: 26
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib10
  article-title: Alcohol as a comparator
– volume: 53
  start-page: 545
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib5
  article-title: A system for psychomotor evaluation; design, implementation and practice effects in volunteers
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00434.x
– volume: 70
  start-page: 124
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib9
  article-title: Is residual impairment after alcohol an effect of repeated performance?
  publication-title: Aviat Space Env Med
– start-page: 337
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib6
  article-title: Effects of anaesthetic and analgesic drugs
– volume: 49
  start-page: 490
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib1
  article-title: The subjective effects of low-dose propofol. A double-blind study to evaluate dimensions of sedation and cosnsciousness with low-dose propofol
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03518.x
– volume: 85
  start-page: 401
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib3
  article-title: Blood alcohol concentration and psychomotor effects
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/85.3.401
SSID ssj0017295
Score 1.7312342
Snippet We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task...
We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target‐controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
oup
istex
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 396
SubjectTerms Adult
anaesthetics i.v
anaesthetics i.v., propofol
Anesthesia Recovery Period
Anesthetics, Intravenous - blood
Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology
Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
Automobile Driving
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Memory - drug effects
Neuropharmacology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
propofol
Propofol - blood
Propofol - pharmacology
Prospective Studies
Psychomotor Performance - drug effects
Reaction Time - drug effects
Recognition (Psychology) - drug effects
recovery
Title Blood propofol concentration and psychomotor effects on driving skills
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/85.3.396
https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-H3SP0DSN-Z/fulltext.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11103180
https://www.proquest.com/docview/197935775
https://www.proquest.com/docview/72437016
Volume 85
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jj9MwFLbQzAUJIRBbGAZyAC5VM0ltZzl2lk6BaUCdVipzsewsokyVVm1GQvx6npckDVAGuERV4qXy99l-fn4LQq8TQWjq0143Ja6AA4qfdCPhcmllntI0S1JXpekcxf5wSt7P6Ky5LlDeJaVwku-_9Sv5H1ThHeAqvWT_Adm6UXgBvwFfeALC8PwrjI-l1bk0sVot86WM81FoW8uysjHWPlaAhozrXVluFJ10Pdd6hOv5YrFp3euaGEdbASV4wWHn-JJt5lzpD44b0M_H_Xii9KdOoxMdTcenH0-GrSun0buLi_64pVX9cBbHn5VW3unEjlHWVuoHt7avKv_k1thacgOo47WWXJ2lx1ALb62fOPK3tmKigpj-usrrCFjiK4jXg5A62KmrbYfT_mmbq40PZeTTULr87ffgaCGzXpzParMgkOcinfXC_G3jLAFdHkGHR1V3u8SYfTk5v1XekvdWfANTLdc5UnYfYpQwM3mA7ptTiN3XlHqI7mTFIzRQdLIrOtktOtlAJ3uLTrahkw2fDJ1sTafHaDo4m5wMuybNRjchUVh2cZR7JBBewlPhkoRkBIs8DVw3U3fesP-RgEcgSQrRSxI_FDJoWxiJ1OUZjjDHT9BesSyyZ8gOIk_0MsKzPMWEU5kZy6cC9ohemGNP5BbqVKPGEhODXqZCWTBtC4EZjDELKcMMxthCb-rSKx17ZUe5owoAZuRGLQ8yIMyOGm8VTnWzfH0tLRwDyoazKzbEl5_c08uYXVnIBiBv6f2whXJTWPPMQgcV6sxM3g3zItgXaRBQC72qv8LCLm_reJEtbzYskKFC4UBmoaeaKk3DnszNErrPb-n5AN1tZuwLtFeub7JDEKFL8VJx_gfMKcTt
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blood+propofol+concentration+and+psychomotor+effects+on+driving+skills&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+anaesthesia+%3A+BJA&rft.au=GRANT%2C+S.+A&rft.au=MURDOCH%2C+J&rft.au=MILLAR%2C+K&rft.au=KENNY%2C+G.+N.+C&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.pub=Oxford+University+Press&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=396&rft.epage=400&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fbja%2F85.3.396&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=1482801
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-0912&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-0912&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-0912&client=summon