Blood propofol concentration and psychomotor effects on driving skills
We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA Vol. 85; no. 3; pp. 396 - 400 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01.09.2000
Oxford University Press Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0007-0912 1471-6771 |
DOI | 10.1093/bja/85.3.396 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 μg ml−1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P<0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 μg ml−1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 μg ml−1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml−1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml−1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers. |
---|---|
AbstractList | We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 μg ml−1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P<0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 μg ml−1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 μg ml−1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml−1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml−1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers. We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target‐controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within‐list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 µg ml–1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P<0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 µg ml–1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within‐list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 µg ml–1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml–1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml–1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 396–400 We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 microgram ml-1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P < 0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml-1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml-1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers. We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 microgram ml-1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P < 0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml-1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml-1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers.We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 microgram ml-1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P < 0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 microgram ml-1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml-1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml-1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers. We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target‐controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within‐list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 µg ml–1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P<0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 µg ml–1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within‐list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 µg ml–1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml–1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml–1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 396–400 |
Author | Murdoch, J. Kenny, G. N. C. Millar, K. Grant, S. A. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: S.A. surname: Grant fullname: Grant, S.A. organization: Glasgow University Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary, 8–16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK – sequence: 2 givenname: J. surname: Murdoch fullname: Murdoch, J. organization: Glasgow University Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary, 8–16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK – sequence: 3 givenname: K. surname: Millar fullname: Millar, K. organization: University Department of Psychological Medicine, Division of Behavioral Sciences, Academic Centre, Gartnaval Royal Hospital, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0XH, UK – sequence: 4 givenname: G.N.C. surname: Kenny fullname: Kenny, G.N.C. organization: Glasgow University Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary, 8–16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1482801$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11103180$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqF0kFvFCEUB3Biauy2evNsJsboxdk-hmGAo1brmjRqUk1ML4QBRtmysMJMY7-9tLPWpGniicP7PXh5fw7QXojBIvQUwxKDIEf9Wh1xuiRLIroHaIFbhuuOMbyHFgDAahC42UcHOa8BMGsEfYT2McZAMIcFOnnrYzTVNsVtHKKvdAzahjGp0cVQqVBK-Ur_jJs4xlTZYbB6zFUpmeQuXfhR5QvnfX6MHg7KZ_tkdx6ibyfvvx6v6tPPHz4evzmtdSv4WBMxlPl6rJXpodWtbUk_GAZgW9pQMMa2TAnGm75vtO54TxkQLnoDyhJBFDlEL-d7y8C_JptHuXFZW-9VsHHKkjUtYYC7Ap_fges4pVBmk1gwQShjtKBnOzT1G2vkNrmNSlfy73oKeLEDKmvlh6SCdvmfa3nDARfWzEynmHOyg9RuvNlgWaTzEoO8jkqWqCSnksgSVWl6fafp9tr7-auZx2n7P1nP0uXR_r61Kl3IjhFG5er7uVyRsy_w7uyTPC--m70twV06m2TWzpZvYFwqaUsT3f0P_QFIscL_ |
CODEN | BJANAD |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_20552076241293597 crossref_primary_10_4103_sja_sja_196_21 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jopan_2016_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1177_0310057X1604400602 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03018752 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_012_2483_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s10877_019_00355_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_006_0109_7 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0375_9393_17_12450_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_pds_546 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2044_2001_02086_x crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0b013e328331d498 crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_12035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2025_01_034 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2011_08_020 crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e3181609531 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_023_02122_z crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03021599 crossref_primary_10_5946_ce_2020_138 |
Cites_doi | 10.1093/bja/71.5.633 10.1097/00000542-197509000-00003 10.1007/BF03004827 10.1093/bja/59.8.970 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00434.x 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03518.x 10.1093/bja/85.3.401 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2000 British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000 2000 INIST-CNRS Copyright British Medical Association Sep 2000 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2000 British Journal of Anaesthesia – notice: 2000 – notice: 2000 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright British Medical Association Sep 2000 |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH BSCLL AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1093/bja/85.3.396 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access Istex CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1471-6771 |
EndPage | 400 |
ExternalDocumentID | 60010678 11103180 1482801 10_1093_bja_85_3_396 10.1093/bja/85.3.396 ark_67375_HXZ_H3SP0DSN_Z S0007091217376614 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -E4 .2P .55 .GJ .I3 .XZ .ZR 18M 1TH 23N 2WC 354 3O- 4.4 482 48X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 5WA 6.Y 6I. 6PF 70D AACTN AAEDW AAESY AAFTH AAIAV AAIYJ AAJKP AALRI AAMVS AAOGV AAPNW AAPXW AAQQT AAUQX AAVAP AAWTL AAXUO ABEUO ABIXL ABJNI ABKDP ABLJU ABMAC ABNKS ABPTD ABQLI ABQTQ ABSMQ ABVKL ABXVV ABZBJ ACCJX ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACMRT ACPQN ACUFI ACUTJ ACUTO ADBBV ADEYI ADHKW ADHZD ADJQC ADOCK ADORX ADQLU ADRIX ADZXQ AEGPL AEJOX AEKPW AEMDU AENEX AENZO AEPUE AEWNT AFFNX AFIYH AFOSN AFTJW AFXEN AGKEF AGKRT AGSYK AHMBA AHPSJ AHXPO AI. AIAGR AIJHB AITUG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC AMRAJ APIBT APWMN ASPBG AVWKF AWCFO AXUDD AZFZN BAWUL BEYMZ BGYMP BHONS BVRKM BZKNY C1A C45 CAG COF CS3 CZ4 DIK DILTD DU5 D~K E3Z EBS EE~ EJD F5P F9B FDB FEDTE GX1 H5~ HAR HVGLF HW0 HZ~ IH2 IOX J21 J5H KAQDR KC5 KOP KQ8 KSI KSN L7B M-Z M41 M49 N9A NCXOZ NGC NTWIH NU- O0~ OAWHX OHH OJQWA OJZSN OK1 OVD O~Y P2P PB- PEELM PQQKQ Q1. Q5Y R44 RD5 RHF RNI ROL ROX ROZ RW1 RXO RZF RZO SSZ TEORI TJX TMA TR2 VH1 W2D W8F WH7 WOQ WOW X7H X7M YHG ZA5 ZGI ZKX ZXP ~91 AAFWJ AAYWO ABEJV ABGNP ABNGD ACUKT ACVFH ADCNI ADVLN AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AIGII AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP BSCLL EFKBS 0SF 0R~ AAYXX ACVCV AEHUL AFETI AFSHK AGMDO APJGH APXCP CITATION H13 P0W IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-39f147b1cadb04c4e43bfd700e45250dde47a9782bb2cc68b570389bd0ae393a3 |
ISSN | 0007-0912 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 08:19:48 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 07:08:44 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:35:10 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:12:45 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:37 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:00:47 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 28 03:19:57 EDT 2024 Tue Aug 05 16:50:45 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:34:56 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | anaesthetics i.v., propofol recovery recovery; anaesthetics i.v., propofol Human General anesthetic Healthy subject Activity concentration relation Memory Cognition Propofol Psychomotricity |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0 CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c498t-39f147b1cadb04c4e43bfd700e45250dde47a9782bb2cc68b570389bd0ae393a3 |
Notes | istex:4E8CD56B8F2490A3873D468803322012AF1754FA ark:/67375/HXZ-H3SP0DSN-Z Accepted for publication: March 30, 2000 local:aed049 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/85.3.396 |
PMID | 11103180 |
PQID | 197935775 |
PQPubID | 41750 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_72437016 proquest_journals_197935775 pubmed_primary_11103180 pascalfrancis_primary_1482801 crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_bja_85_3_396 crossref_primary_10_1093_bja_85_3_396 oup_primary_10_1093_bja_85_3_396 istex_primary_ark_67375_HXZ_H3SP0DSN_Z elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1093_bja_85_3_396 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2000-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2000-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2000 text: 2000-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Br. J. Anaesth |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Br. J. Anaesth |
PublicationYear | 2000 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Oxford University Press Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Oxford University Press – name: Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
References | Moss, Hindmarch, Pan, Edmondson (bib7) 1987; 59 Flatt, Birrell, Hobbes (bib11) 1984; 12 Munglani, Andrade, Sapsford, Baddeley, Jones (bib8) 1993; 71 Millar (bib6) 1992 Grant, Millar, Kenny (bib3) 2000; 85 Millar, Finnigan, Hammersley (bib9) 1999; 70 Kortilla, Linnola, Ertama, Hakkinen (bib2) 1975; 43 Tiplady (bib10) 1991 Whitehead, Sanders, Oldroyd (bib1) 1994; 49 Steward (bib4) 1975; 22 Hope, Woolman, Gray, Asbury, Millar (bib5) 1998; 53 Steward (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib4) 1975; 22 Tiplady (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib10) 1991 Kortilla (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib2) 1975; 43 Munglani (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib8) 1993; 71 Whitehead (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib1) 1994; 49 Grant (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib3) 2000; 85 Millar (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib9) 1999; 70 Millar (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib6) 1992 Moss (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib7) 1987; 59 Hope (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib5) 1998; 53 Flatt (10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib11) 1984; 12 |
References_xml | – start-page: 337 year: 1992 end-page: 385 ident: bib6 article-title: Effects of anaesthetic and analgesic drugs publication-title: Handbook of Human Performance – volume: 71 start-page: 633 year: 1993 end-page: 641 ident: bib8 article-title: A measure of consciousness and memory during isoflurane administration: the coherent frequency publication-title: Br J Anaesth – volume: 85 start-page: 401 year: 2000 end-page: 406 ident: bib3 article-title: Blood alcohol concentration and psychomotor effects publication-title: Br J Anaesth – volume: 12 start-page: 315 year: 1984 end-page: 324 ident: bib11 article-title: Effects of anesthesia on some aspects of mental functioning of surgical patients publication-title: Anesth Crit Care – volume: 43 start-page: 291 year: 1975 end-page: 299 ident: bib2 article-title: Recovery and simulated driving after intravenous anaesthesia with thiopental, methohexital, propanidid or alphadione publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 22 start-page: 111 year: 1975 end-page: 113 ident: bib4 article-title: A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room publication-title: Can Anaesth Soc J – volume: 53 start-page: 545 year: 1998 end-page: 550 ident: bib5 article-title: A system for psychomotor evaluation; design, implementation and practice effects in volunteers publication-title: Anaesthesia – volume: 70 start-page: 124 year: 1999 end-page: 130 ident: bib9 article-title: Is residual impairment after alcohol an effect of repeated performance? publication-title: Aviat Space Env Med – volume: 59 start-page: 970 year: 1987 end-page: 977 ident: bib7 article-title: A comparison of recovery after halothane and alfentanil after minor surgery publication-title: Br J Anaesth – volume: 49 start-page: 490 year: 1994 end-page: 496 ident: bib1 article-title: The subjective effects of low-dose propofol. A double-blind study to evaluate dimensions of sedation and cosnsciousness with low-dose propofol publication-title: Anaesthesia – start-page: 26 year: 1991 end-page: 37 ident: bib10 article-title: Alcohol as a comparator publication-title: Ambulatory Anaesthesia and Sedation: Impairment and Recovery – volume: 71 start-page: 633 year: 1993 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib8 article-title: A measure of consciousness and memory during isoflurane administration: the coherent frequency publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/71.5.633 – volume: 12 start-page: 315 year: 1984 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib11 article-title: Effects of anesthesia on some aspects of mental functioning of surgical patients publication-title: Anesth Crit Care – volume: 43 start-page: 291 year: 1975 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib2 article-title: Recovery and simulated driving after intravenous anaesthesia with thiopental, methohexital, propanidid or alphadione publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-197509000-00003 – volume: 22 start-page: 111 year: 1975 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib4 article-title: A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room publication-title: Can Anaesth Soc J doi: 10.1007/BF03004827 – volume: 59 start-page: 970 year: 1987 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib7 article-title: A comparison of recovery after halothane and alfentanil after minor surgery publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/59.8.970 – start-page: 26 year: 1991 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib10 article-title: Alcohol as a comparator – volume: 53 start-page: 545 year: 1998 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib5 article-title: A system for psychomotor evaluation; design, implementation and practice effects in volunteers publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00434.x – volume: 70 start-page: 124 year: 1999 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib9 article-title: Is residual impairment after alcohol an effect of repeated performance? publication-title: Aviat Space Env Med – start-page: 337 year: 1992 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib6 article-title: Effects of anaesthetic and analgesic drugs – volume: 49 start-page: 490 year: 1994 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib1 article-title: The subjective effects of low-dose propofol. A double-blind study to evaluate dimensions of sedation and cosnsciousness with low-dose propofol publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03518.x – volume: 85 start-page: 401 year: 2000 ident: 10.1093/bja/85.3.396_bib3 article-title: Blood alcohol concentration and psychomotor effects publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/85.3.401 |
SSID | ssj0017295 |
Score | 1.7312342 |
Snippet | We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task... We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target‐controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref oup istex elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 396 |
SubjectTerms | Adult anaesthetics i.v anaesthetics i.v., propofol Anesthesia Recovery Period Anesthetics, Intravenous - blood Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents Automobile Driving Biological and medical sciences Female Humans Male Medical sciences Memory - drug effects Neuropharmacology Pharmacology. Drug treatments propofol Propofol - blood Propofol - pharmacology Prospective Studies Psychomotor Performance - drug effects Reaction Time - drug effects Recognition (Psychology) - drug effects recovery |
Title | Blood propofol concentration and psychomotor effects on driving skills |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/85.3.396 https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-H3SP0DSN-Z/fulltext.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11103180 https://www.proquest.com/docview/197935775 https://www.proquest.com/docview/72437016 |
Volume | 85 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jj9MwFLbQzAUJIRBbGAZyAC5VM0ltZzl2lk6BaUCdVipzsewsokyVVm1GQvx6npckDVAGuERV4qXy99l-fn4LQq8TQWjq0143Ja6AA4qfdCPhcmllntI0S1JXpekcxf5wSt7P6Ky5LlDeJaVwku-_9Sv5H1ThHeAqvWT_Adm6UXgBvwFfeALC8PwrjI-l1bk0sVot86WM81FoW8uysjHWPlaAhozrXVluFJ10Pdd6hOv5YrFp3euaGEdbASV4wWHn-JJt5lzpD44b0M_H_Xii9KdOoxMdTcenH0-GrSun0buLi_64pVX9cBbHn5VW3unEjlHWVuoHt7avKv_k1thacgOo47WWXJ2lx1ALb62fOPK3tmKigpj-usrrCFjiK4jXg5A62KmrbYfT_mmbq40PZeTTULr87ffgaCGzXpzParMgkOcinfXC_G3jLAFdHkGHR1V3u8SYfTk5v1XekvdWfANTLdc5UnYfYpQwM3mA7ptTiN3XlHqI7mTFIzRQdLIrOtktOtlAJ3uLTrahkw2fDJ1sTafHaDo4m5wMuybNRjchUVh2cZR7JBBewlPhkoRkBIs8DVw3U3fesP-RgEcgSQrRSxI_FDJoWxiJ1OUZjjDHT9BesSyyZ8gOIk_0MsKzPMWEU5kZy6cC9ohemGNP5BbqVKPGEhODXqZCWTBtC4EZjDELKcMMxthCb-rSKx17ZUe5owoAZuRGLQ8yIMyOGm8VTnWzfH0tLRwDyoazKzbEl5_c08uYXVnIBiBv6f2whXJTWPPMQgcV6sxM3g3zItgXaRBQC72qv8LCLm_reJEtbzYskKFC4UBmoaeaKk3DnszNErrPb-n5AN1tZuwLtFeub7JDEKFL8VJx_gfMKcTt |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blood+propofol+concentration+and+psychomotor+effects+on+driving+skills&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+anaesthesia+%3A+BJA&rft.au=GRANT%2C+S.+A&rft.au=MURDOCH%2C+J&rft.au=MILLAR%2C+K&rft.au=KENNY%2C+G.+N.+C&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.pub=Oxford+University+Press&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=396&rft.epage=400&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fbja%2F85.3.396&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=1482801 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-0912&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-0912&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-0912&client=summon |