Blood propofol concentration and psychomotor effects on driving skills

We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of anaesthesia : BJA Vol. 85; no. 3; pp. 396 - 400
Main Authors Grant, S.A., Murdoch, J., Millar, K., Kenny, G.N.C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2000
Oxford University Press
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We studied psychomotor performance in 10 healthy volunteers during recovery after a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Choice reaction time, dual task tracking with secondary reaction time and a within-list recognition task were assessed at target blood propofol concentrations of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 μg ml−1. Performance was impaired most at the highest blood propofol concentration (choice reaction time increased by a mean of 247 ms and secondary reaction time by a mean of 178 ms). Choice reaction time and dual task tracking with secondary reaction time were the most sensitive and reliable methods of assessment (significant difference from baseline (P<0.05) at a propofol concentration of 0.2 μg ml−1 with choice and secondary reaction time testing). Within-list recognition assessment of memory was not sufficiently sensitive at very low propofol concentrations. The impairment in choice and secondary reaction time with a blood propofol concentration of 0.2 μg ml−1 was less than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 50 mg 100 ml−1 and no greater than that observed with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 mg 100 ml−1 in a previous study involving healthy volunteers.
Bibliography:istex:4E8CD56B8F2490A3873D468803322012AF1754FA
ark:/67375/HXZ-H3SP0DSN-Z
Accepted for publication: March 30, 2000
local:aed049
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-0912
1471-6771
DOI:10.1093/bja/85.3.396