In vitro antitrypanosomal activity of plant terpenes against Trypanosoma brucei
The antitrypanosomal activity of 24 known plant terpenes was evaluated against Trypanosoma brucei brucei. Among them, α-eudesmol, hinesol, nardosinone and 4-peroxy-1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-α-santonin exhibited selective and potent antitrypanosomal activities. [Display omitted] ► The antitrypanosomal activ...
Saved in:
Published in | Phytochemistry (Oxford) Vol. 72; no. 16; pp. 2024 - 2030 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier Ltd
01.11.2011
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The antitrypanosomal activity of 24 known plant terpenes was evaluated against
Trypanosoma brucei brucei. Among them, α-eudesmol, hinesol, nardosinone and 4-peroxy-1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-α-santonin exhibited selective and potent antitrypanosomal activities.
[Display omitted]
► The antitrypanosomal activity of 24 terpenes was evaluated against
Trypanosoma brucei. ► Among them, 22 plant terpenes exhibited some level of the activity. ► α-Eudesmol and hinesol exhibited most selective and potent activities. ► Nardosinone and 4-peroxy-1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-α-santonin also showed potent activities.
During the course of screening to discover antitrypanosomal compounds, 24 known plant terpenes (6 sesquiterpenes, 14 sesquiterpene lactones and 4 diterpenes) were evaluated for
in vitro antitrypanosomal activity against
Trypanosoma brucei brucei. Among them, 22 terpenes exhibited antitrypanosomal activity. In particular, α-eudesmol, hinesol, nardosinone and 4-peroxy-1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-α-santonin all exhibited selective and potent antitrypanosomal activities
in vitro. Detailed here in an
in vitro antitrypanosomal properties and cytotoxicities of the 24 terpenes compared with two therapeutic antitrypanosomal drugs (eflornithine and suramin). This finding represents the first report of promising trypanocidal activity of these terpenes. Present results also provide some valuable insight with regard to structure–activity relationships and the possible mode of action of the compounds. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0031-9422 1873-3700 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.07.015 |