German short forms of the Oral Health Impact Profile
– Objectives: We report the development and psychometric evaluation of short forms of the Oral Health Impact Profile German version (OHIP‐G) ‐ an instrument to assess oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL). Methods: A five‐item short form was developed using best subset regression in 2050 s...
Saved in:
Published in | Community dentistry and oral epidemiology Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 277 - 288 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.08.2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | – Objectives: We report the development and psychometric evaluation of short forms of the Oral Health Impact Profile German version (OHIP‐G) ‐ an instrument to assess oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL).
Methods: A five‐item short form was developed using best subset regression in 2050 subjects from a national survey. Two 14‐item versions were derived from English‐language short forms and a 21‐item version from previous factor analytic work. A second sample from the general population (n = 163) and a sample of clinical patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD; n = 175) were used to investigate validity and internal consistency. Test‐retest reliability was evaluated in 30 prosthodontic patients before treatment. Responsiveness was assessed in 67 patients treated for their TMD pain.
Results: Associations between short form summary scores and self‐report of oral health and four oral disorders in the general population and in TMD patients were interpreted as support for convergent/groups validity. The instruments’ responsiveness (effect measures of 0.55–0.98), test‐retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.72–0.87), and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.65–0.92) were sufficient.
Conclusions: Sufficient discriminative and evaluative psychometric properties of short forms of the OHIP‐G make the instruments suitable to assess OHRQoL in cross‐sectional as well as longitudinal studies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:2657613BB82798164BC5AADA7A722CB230EE16AD ark:/67375/WNG-5JQG6R6B-P ArticleID:CDOE279 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0301-5661 1600-0528 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00279.x |