The use of personal flotation devices in the Northeast lobster fishing industry: An examination of the decision-making process

Background This study explored perspectives of Northeast commercial lobstermen regarding the use of personal flotation devices (PFDs). Researchers sought to identify factors contributing to low PFD use, and motivators that could lead to increased use of PFDs. Methods This qualitative research (n = 7...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of industrial medicine Vol. 59; no. 1; pp. 73 - 80
Main Authors Weil, R., Pinto, K., Lincoln, J., Hall-Arber, M., Sorensen, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background This study explored perspectives of Northeast commercial lobstermen regarding the use of personal flotation devices (PFDs). Researchers sought to identify factors contributing to low PFD use, and motivators that could lead to increased use of PFDs. Methods This qualitative research (n = 72) included 25 commercial fishermen who participated in in‐depth, semi‐structured interviews, and 47 attendees of Lobstermen's meetings who engaged in focus groups. Results The results showed substantial barriers to PFD use. Fishermen described themselves as being proactive about safety whenever possible, but described a longstanding tradition of not wearing PFDs. Key factors integrally linked with the lack of PFD use were workability, identity/social stigma, and risk diffusion. Conclusion Future safety interventions will need to address significant barriers to PFD use that include issues of comfort and ease of use, as well as social acceptability of PFDs and reorientation of risk perceptions related to falls overboard. Am. J. Ind. Med. 59:73–80, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:istex:56DE99D0FD64C55D0BAF79062D0803CCE8AEB678
ark:/67375/WNG-186WKMDP-X
ArticleID:AJIM22537
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0271-3586
1097-0274
DOI:10.1002/ajim.22537