SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN COMPOSITION AND SELECTED SENSORY ATTRIBUTES OF REINDEER, CARIBOU AND BEEF

ABSTRACT The longissimus from caribou (n = 6), reindeer (n = 6) and beef (n = 6) were evaluated to determine differences in composition, color and sensory properties. Caribou contained the least fat followed by reindeer, and then beef (P < 0.05). Both venison sources contained more heme pigment a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of muscle foods Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 65 - 78
Main Authors RINCKER, P.J., BECHTEL, P.J., FINSTADT, G., VAN BUUREN, R.G.C., KILLEFER, J., MCKEITH, F.K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Science Inc 01.01.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT The longissimus from caribou (n = 6), reindeer (n = 6) and beef (n = 6) were evaluated to determine differences in composition, color and sensory properties. Caribou contained the least fat followed by reindeer, and then beef (P < 0.05). Both venison sources contained more heme pigment and had a higher glycolytic potential than beef (P < 0.05). A trained sensory panel found both sources of venison to be more tender than beef (P < 0.05); however, Warner–Bratzler shear force yielded no significant differences. The sensory panel scored both reindeer and caribou as having a more intense off‐flavor (livery) and less intense meat‐flavor than beef (P < 0.05). Venison was darker than beef as determined by Minolta L* values (P < 0.05). No differences (P > 0.05) were found in ultimate pH or juiciness (sensory panel) among any of the products. Results from this study indicate that reindeer and caribou are a low‐fat source of protein with desirable sensory characteristics.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JMF036
ark:/67375/WNG-Q1317LPM-1
istex:CB5F1D2FFC3608934410668EA6F6C22E527A28E4
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1046-0756
1745-4573
DOI:10.1111/j.1745-4573.2006.00036.x