Long-term functional results of colonic J pouch versus straight coloanal anastomosis

Background: There are very few studies evaluating the long‐term functional outcome of coloanal anastomoses. This retrospective study aimed to compare long‐term functional results of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Methods: Thirty‐seven patients, 25 with a straight anastomosis and 12 with a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of surgery Vol. 86; no. 9; pp. 1176 - 1179
Main Authors Barrier, A., Martel, P., Gallot, D., Dugue, L., Sezeur, A., Malafosse, M.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.09.1999
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: There are very few studies evaluating the long‐term functional outcome of coloanal anastomoses. This retrospective study aimed to compare long‐term functional results of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Methods: Thirty‐seven patients, 25 with a straight anastomosis and 12 with a J pouch anastomosis, responded to a standardized telephone questionnaire. The mean time since surgery was 10 (range 4–18) years. Results: The mean daily stool frequency was similar in both groups of patients (1·1 in patients with a reservoir, 1·5 in patients with a straight anastomosis). In both groups, two‐thirds of patients had perfect continence or limited gas incontinence. Faecal incontinence was reported by two patients with a straight anastomosis and one patient with a pouch. Nocturnal stools and fragmentation were slightly more frequent in patients with a straight anastomosis. Half of the patients regularly used medication. Thirty‐five of the 37 patients reported satisfaction with functional results. Conclusion: Long‐term functional results of coloanal anastomoses are satisfactory and, unlike early results, similar for both types of anastomosis. The functional benefit of a reservoir, seen in the first year after operation, is less evident with increasing time. © 1999 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd
Bibliography:ArticleID:BJS105
istex:19B9FBD0AA62BCE54D92801AFB8AB2D6D0D5BBDB
ark:/67375/WNG-K6LRCHDB-J
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01224.x