Long-term functional results of colonic J pouch versus straight coloanal anastomosis
Background: There are very few studies evaluating the long‐term functional outcome of coloanal anastomoses. This retrospective study aimed to compare long‐term functional results of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Methods: Thirty‐seven patients, 25 with a straight anastomosis and 12 with a...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of surgery Vol. 86; no. 9; pp. 1176 - 1179 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Science Ltd
01.09.1999
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background:
There are very few studies evaluating the long‐term functional outcome of coloanal anastomoses. This retrospective study aimed to compare long‐term functional results of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses.
Methods:
Thirty‐seven patients, 25 with a straight anastomosis and 12 with a J pouch anastomosis, responded to a standardized telephone questionnaire. The mean time since surgery was 10 (range 4–18) years.
Results:
The mean daily stool frequency was similar in both groups of patients (1·1 in patients with a reservoir, 1·5 in patients with a straight anastomosis). In both groups, two‐thirds of patients had perfect continence or limited gas incontinence. Faecal incontinence was reported by two patients with a straight anastomosis and one patient with a pouch. Nocturnal stools and fragmentation were slightly more frequent in patients with a straight anastomosis. Half of the patients regularly used medication. Thirty‐five of the 37 patients reported satisfaction with functional results.
Conclusion:
Long‐term functional results of coloanal anastomoses are satisfactory and, unlike early results, similar for both types of anastomosis. The functional benefit of a reservoir, seen in the first year after operation, is less evident with increasing time. © 1999 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:BJS105 istex:19B9FBD0AA62BCE54D92801AFB8AB2D6D0D5BBDB ark:/67375/WNG-K6LRCHDB-J ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-1323 1365-2168 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01224.x |