Self-serving attributions, managerial cognition, and company performance

Past research using managers' attributions for good and poor performance in annual reports has repeatedly demonstrated that management takes credit for good outcomes. However, there is disagreement about whether this pattern of attributions reflects attempts to manage impressions in stakeholder...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStrategic management journal Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 219 - 229
Main Authors Clapham, Stephen E., Schwenk, Charles R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.03.1991
John Wiley and Sons
Wiley
John Wiley
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Past research using managers' attributions for good and poor performance in annual reports has repeatedly demonstrated that management takes credit for good outcomes. However, there is disagreement about whether this pattern of attributions reflects attempts to manage impressions in stakeholders or biased perceptions on the part of management, and whether it is associated with increases or decreases in future performance. In this study, attributions in letters to shareholders in the annual reports of public utilities were analyzed. The results showed the same general pattern of attributions as was found in previous studies. However, the relationship between this pattern of attributions and performance (earnings per share growth) was generally negative. Implications of these results for future research are discussed.
Bibliography:ArticleID:SMJ4250120305
ark:/67375/WNG-98DQDRRV-D
istex:344CF0B69148253FA70FB55C9B127F1DB5ED2EF6
ISSN:0143-2095
1097-0266
DOI:10.1002/smj.4250120305