Phase I Trial of Anti-PSMA Designer CAR-T Cells in Prostate Cancer: Possible Role for Interacting Interleukin 2-T Cell Pharmacodynamics as a Determinant of Clinical Response
BACKGROUND Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐modified “designer” T cells (dTc, CAR‐T) against PSMA selectively target antigen‐expressing cells in vitro and eliminate tumors in vivo. Interleukin 2 (IL2), widely used in adoptive therapies, was proven essential in animal models for dTc to eradicate estab...
Saved in:
Published in | The Prostate Vol. 76; no. 14; pp. 1257 - 1270 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.10.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | BACKGROUND
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐modified “designer” T cells (dTc, CAR‐T) against PSMA selectively target antigen‐expressing cells in vitro and eliminate tumors in vivo. Interleukin 2 (IL2), widely used in adoptive therapies, was proven essential in animal models for dTc to eradicate established solid tumors.
METHODS
Patients underwent chemotherapy conditioning, followed by dTc dosing under a Phase I escalation with continuous infusion low dose IL2 (LDI). A target of dTc escalation was to achieve ≥20% engraftment of infused activated T cells.
RESULTS
Six patients enrolled with doses prepared of whom five were treated. Patients received 109 or 1010 autologous T cells, achieving expansions of 20–560‐fold over 2 weeks and engraftments of 5–56%. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses established the impact of conditioning to promote expansion and engraftment of the infused T cells. Unexpectedly, administered IL2 was depleted up to 20‐fold with high engraftments of activated T cells (aTc) in an inverse correlation (P < 0.01). Clinically, no anti‐PSMA toxicities were noted, and no anti‐CAR reactivities were detected post‐treatment. Two‐of‐five patients achieved clinical partial responses (PR), with PSA declines of 50% and 70% and PSA delays of 78 and 150 days, plus a minor response in a third patient. Responses were unrelated to dose size (P = 0.6), instead correlating inversely with engraftment (P = 0.06) and directly with plasma IL2 (P = 0.03), suggesting insufficient IL2 with our LDI protocol to support dTc anti‐tumor activity under optimal (high) dTc engraftments.
CONCLUSIONS
Under a Phase I dose escalation in prostate cancer, a 20% engraftment target was met or exceeded in three subjects with adequate safety, leading to study conclusion. Clinical responses were obtained but were suggested to be restrained by low plasma IL2 when depleted by high levels of engrafted activated T cells. This report presents a unique example of how the pharmacodynamics of “drug–drug” interactions may have a critical impact on the efficacy of their co‐application. A new Pilot/Phase II trial is planned to test moderate dose IL2 (MDI) together with high dTc engraftments for anticipated improved therapeutic efficacy. Prostate 76:1257–1270, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:049EDC2077D90F6AC4B1BA88975D57869DD51C45 ark:/67375/WNG-QNZJ02BM-W Amgen Prometheus Laboratories Inc. Prostate Cancer Foundation Novartis Corporation ArticleID:PROS23214 DOD Prostate Cancer Program ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0270-4137 1097-0045 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pros.23214 |