Plant species phenology differs between climate and land‐use scenarios and relates to plant functional traits

• Published in: Ecology and evolution Vol. 14; no. 5; pp. e11441 - n/a
• Main Authors: Plos, Carolin, Hensen, Isabell, Korell, Lotte, Auge, Harald, Römermann, Christine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.05.2024; Wiley
• Subjects: Climate change; Climate effects; Climatic conditions; Drought; Experiments; Flowering; flowering phenology; Flowers & plants; global change experimental facility (GCEF); Grasslands; grazing; Land use; Leaf area; Meadows; Mowing; Pasture; Phenology; Plant reproduction; Plant species; Plants (botany); Precipitation; Species; species‐specific responses; Temperature; Germany; mowing; flowering phenology; grazing; global change experimental facility (GCEF); species‐specific responses; climate change
• ISSN: 2045-7758; 2045-7758
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11441

Phenological shifts due to changing climate are often highly species and context specific. Land‐use practices such as mowing or grazing directly affect the phenology of grassland species, but it is unclear if plants are similarly affected by climate change in differently managed grassland systems such as meadows and pastures. Functional traits have a high potential to explain phenological shifts and might help to understand species‐specific and land‐use‐specific phenological responses to changes in climate. In the large‐scale field experiment Global Change Experimental Facility (GCEF), we monitored the first flowering day, last flowering day, flowering duration, and day of peak flowering, of 17 herbaceous grassland species under ambient and future climate conditions, comparing meadows and pastures. Both climate and land use impacted the flowering phenology of plant species in species‐specific ways. We did not find evidence for interacting effects of climate and land‐use type on plant phenology. However, the data indicate that microclimatic and microsite conditions on meadows and pastures were differently affected by future climate, making differential effects on meadows and pastures likely. Functional traits, including the phenological niche and grassland utilization indicator values, explained species‐specific phenological climate responses. Late flowering species and species with a low mowing tolerance advanced their flowering more strongly under future climate. Long flowering species and species following an acquisitive strategy (high specific leaf area, high mowing tolerance, and high forage value) advanced their flowering end more strongly and thus more strongly shortened their flowering under future climate. We associated these trait–response relationships primarily with a phenological drought escape during summer. Our results provide novel insights on how climate and land use impact the flowering phenology of grassland species and we highlight the role of functional traits in mediating phenological responses to climate. We investigated how future climate and land‐use type (i.e. mowing vs. grazing) individually and interactively affect the flowering phenology of grassland plant species in a large‐scale field experiment. Both, climate and land use impacted the flowering phenology of plant species in species‐specific ways. Functional traits related to the growth strategy and the phenological niche explained species‐specific phenological climate responses.