Cooking shapes the structure and function of the gut microbiome
Diet is a critical determinant of variation in gut microbial structure and function, outweighing even host genetics 1 – 3 . Numerous microbiome studies have compared diets with divergent ingredients 1 – 5 , but the everyday practice of cooking remains understudied. Here, we show that a plant diet se...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature microbiology Vol. 4; no. 12; pp. 2052 - 2063 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.12.2019
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Diet is a critical determinant of variation in gut microbial structure and function, outweighing even host genetics
1
–
3
. Numerous microbiome studies have compared diets with divergent ingredients
1
–
5
, but the everyday practice of cooking remains understudied. Here, we show that a plant diet served raw versus cooked reshapes the murine gut microbiome, with effects attributable to improvements in starch digestibility and degradation of plant-derived compounds. Shifts in the gut microbiota modulated host energy status, applied across multiple starch-rich plants, and were detectable in humans. Thus, diet-driven host–microbial interactions depend on the food as well as its form. Because cooking is human-specific, ubiquitous and ancient
6
,
7
, our results prompt the hypothesis that humans and our microbiomes co-evolved under unique cooking-related pressures.
Cooked and raw plant diets cause different changes in gut microbiome composition and function, including mechanisms of starch digestibility and xenobiotic availability, and consequently impact host energy status. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 William F. Milton Fund Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) AC02-05CH11231 USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Leakey Foundation National Institutes of Health (NIH) G.W. Hooper Foundation UCSF Boston Nutrition Obesity Research Center Harvard Dean’s Competitive Fund for Promising Scholarship R.N.C. and P.J.T. designed the study. R.N.C. and K.S.C. performed the animal experiments. R.N.C., K.S.C. and V.M.R. performed the human experiments. R.N.C., J.E.B., K.S.C. and P.J.T. performed 16S rDNA sequencing and/or associated data analysis. R.N.C. and J.E.B. performed qPCR and associated data analysis. R.N.C., J.E.B., S.L., K.S.P. and P.J.T. performed microbial RNA sequencing and/or associated data analysis. Q.Y.A. performed bomb calorimetry. J.E.B., B.P.B., K.B.L., D.T., E.N.B., T.R.N. and P.J.T. performed metabolomics assays and/or associated data analysis. C.F.M. and K.C.B. performed microbial physiology assays and associated data analysis. P.S. performed in vitro growth experiments and associated data analysis. T.W.B. validated and performed measurements of body composition in mice. R.N.C., J.E.B. and P.J.T. wrote the manuscript with input from all co-authors. Author contributions |
ISSN: | 2058-5276 2058-5276 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41564-019-0569-4 |