Connectomes: from a sparsity of networks to large-scale databases

The analysis of whole brain networks started in the 1980s when only a handful of connectomes were available. In these early days, information about the human connectome was absent and one could only dream about having information about connectivity in a single human subject. Thanks to non-invasive m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in neuroinformatics Vol. 17; p. 1170337
Main Author Kaiser, Marcus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 12.06.2023
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The analysis of whole brain networks started in the 1980s when only a handful of connectomes were available. In these early days, information about the human connectome was absent and one could only dream about having information about connectivity in a single human subject. Thanks to non-invasive methods such as diffusion imaging, we now know about connectivity in many species and, for some species, in many individuals. To illustrate the rapid change in availability of connectome data, the UK Biobank is on track to record structural and functional connectivity in 100,000 human subjects. Moreover, connectome data from a range of species is now available: from Caenorhabditis elegans and the fruit fly to pigeons, rodents, cats, non-human primates, and humans. This review will give a brief overview of what structural connectivity data is now available, how connectomes are organized, and how their organization shows common features across species. Finally, I will outline some of the current challenges and potential future work in making use of connectome information.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Edited by: Sean L. Hill, CAMH, Canada
Reviewed by: Xi-Nian Zuo, Beijing Normal University, China; Qixiang Lin, Emory University, United States; Vikram Ravindra, University of Cincinnati, United States
ISSN:1662-5196
1662-5196
DOI:10.3389/fninf.2023.1170337