Adjacency and Area Explain Species Bioregional Shifts in Neotropical Palms

• Published in: Frontiers in plant science Vol. 10; p. 55
• Main Authors: Freitas, Cintia G., Bacon, Christine D., Souza-Neto, Advaldo C., Collevatti, Rosane G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 05.02.2019
• Subjects: arecaceae; biogeography; Biologi; Biological Sciences; community phylogenetics; dispersal; ecology; evolution; geographical variables; niche conservatism; patterns; phylogenetic; phylogenetic nestedness; phylogenetic turnover; plant diversity; Plant Science; r package; scale; phylogenetic nestedness; geographical variables; community phylogenetics; phylogenetic turnover; arecaceae
• ISSN: 1664-462X; 1664-462X
• DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00055

Environmental and geographical variables are known drivers of community assembly, however their influence on phylogenetic structure and phylogenetic beta diversity of lineages within different bioregions is not well-understood. Using Neotropical palms as a model, we investigate how environmental and geographical variables affect the assembly of lineages into bioregions across an evolutionary time scale. We also determine lineage shifts between tropical (TRF) and non-tropical (non-TRF) forests. Our results identify that distance and area explain phylogenetic dissimilarity among bioregions. Lineages in smaller bioregions are a subset of larger bioregions and contribute significantly to the nestedness component of phylogenetic dissimilarity, here interpreted as evidence for a bioregional shift. We found a significant tendency of habitat shifts occurring preferentially between TRF and non-TRF bioregions (31 shifts) than from non-TRF to TRF (24) or from TRF to TRF (11) and non-TRF to non-TRF (9). Our results also present cases where low dissimilarity is found between TRF and non-TRF bioregions. Most bioregions showed phylogenetic clustering and larger bioregions tended to be more clustered than smaller ones, with a higher species turnover component of phylogenetic dissimilarity. However, phylogenetic structure did not differ between TRF and non-TRF bioregions and diversification rates were higher in only two lineages, Attaleinae and Bactridinae, which are widespread and overabundant in both TRF and non-TRF bioregions. Area and distance significantly affected Neotropical palm community assembly and contributed more than environmental variables. Despite palms being emblematic humid forest elements, we found multiple shifts from humid to dry bioregions, showing that palms are also important components of these environments.