Pharmacokinetics of thiopentone enantiomers following intravenous injection or prolonged infusion of rac‐thiopentone
Aims Thiopentone is administered as a racemate (rac‐thiopentone) for induction of anaesthesia as well as for neurological and neurosurgical emergencies. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rac‐thiopentone have been extensively studied but the component R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐ enantiomers, until v...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 43; no. 4; pp. 355 - 362 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Science Ltd
01.04.1997
Blackwell Science Blackwell Science Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aims Thiopentone is administered as a racemate (rac‐thiopentone) for induction of anaesthesia as well as for neurological and neurosurgical emergencies. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rac‐thiopentone have been extensively studied but the component R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐ enantiomers, until very recently, have been largely ignored.
Methods The present study analyses the pharmacokinetics of R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐thiopentone in 12 patients given rac‐thiopentone intravenously for induction of anaesthesia and five patients given a prolonged infusion of rac‐thiopentone used for treatment of intracranial hypertension.
Results The mean total body clearance (CLT ) and apparent volume of distribution at steady‐state (V
ss ) showed trends towards higher values for R‐(+)‐ than for S‐(−)‐thiopentone in both patient groups; CLT and V
ss of unbound fractions of R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐thiopentone, however, did not show these trends. The time courses of R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐ thiopentone serum concentrations were so similar that EEG effect could not be attributed to one or other enantiomer. Serum protein binding for S‐(−)‐thiopentone was greater than for R‐(+)‐thiopentone (P=0.02) and 24 h urinary excretion of R‐(+)‐thiopentone was greater than for S‐(−)thiopentone (P=0.03). In one patient, concomitant measurement of CSF and serum thiopentone concentrations found that serum: CSF equilibration of unbound fractions of both enantiomers was essentially complete.
Conclusions The study was unable to determine any pharmacokinetic difference of clinical significance between the R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐thiopentone enantiomers and concludes that minor differences in CLT and V
ss could be explained by enantioselective difference found in serum protein binding. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0306-5251 1365-2125 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00567.x |