Pharmacokinetics of thiopentone enantiomers following intravenous injection or prolonged infusion of rac‐thiopentone

Aims Thiopentone is administered as a racemate (rac‐thiopentone) for induction of anaesthesia as well as for neurological and neurosurgical emergencies. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rac‐thiopentone have been extensively studied but the component R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐ enantiomers, until v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 43; no. 4; pp. 355 - 362
Main Authors Cordato, D. J., Gross, A. S., Herkes, G. K., Mather, L. E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.04.1997
Blackwell Science
Blackwell Science Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims Thiopentone is administered as a racemate (rac‐thiopentone) for induction of anaesthesia as well as for neurological and neurosurgical emergencies. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rac‐thiopentone have been extensively studied but the component R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐ enantiomers, until very recently, have been largely ignored. Methods The present study analyses the pharmacokinetics of R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐thiopentone in 12 patients given rac‐thiopentone intravenously for induction of anaesthesia and five patients given a prolonged infusion of rac‐thiopentone used for treatment of intracranial hypertension. Results The mean total body clearance (CLT ) and apparent volume of distribution at steady‐state (V  ss ) showed trends towards higher values for R‐(+)‐ than for S‐(−)‐thiopentone in both patient groups; CLT and V ss of unbound fractions of R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐thiopentone, however, did not show these trends. The time courses of R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐ thiopentone serum concentrations were so similar that EEG effect could not be attributed to one or other enantiomer. Serum protein binding for S‐(−)‐thiopentone was greater than for R‐(+)‐thiopentone (P=0.02) and 24 h urinary excretion of R‐(+)‐thiopentone was greater than for S‐(−)thiopentone (P=0.03). In one patient, concomitant measurement of CSF and serum thiopentone concentrations found that serum: CSF equilibration of unbound fractions of both enantiomers was essentially complete. Conclusions The study was unable to determine any pharmacokinetic difference of clinical significance between the R‐(+)‐ and S‐(−)‐thiopentone enantiomers and concludes that minor differences in CLT and V ss could be explained by enantioselective difference found in serum protein binding.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00567.x