Systemic antibiotics in the treatment of aggressive periodontitis. A systematic review and a Bayesian Network meta-analysis
Aim The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systemic antibiotic therapy on the treatment of aggressive periodontitis (AgP). Methods This study was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched up to June 2014 for ran...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical periodontology Vol. 42; no. 7; pp. 647 - 657 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.07.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aim
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systemic antibiotic therapy on the treatment of aggressive periodontitis (AgP).
Methods
This study was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched up to June 2014 for randomized clinical trials comparing the treatment of subjects with AgP with either scaling and root planing (SRP) alone or associated with systemic antibiotics. Bayesian network meta‐analysis was prepared using the Bayesian random‐effects hierarchical models and the outcomes reported at 6‐month post‐treatment.
Results
Out of 350 papers identified, 14 studies were eligible. Greater gain in clinical attachment (CA) (mean difference [MD]: 1.08 mm; p < 0.0001) and reduction in probing depth (PD) (MD: 1.05 mm; p < 0.00001) were observed for SRP + metronidazole (Mtz), and for SRP + Mtz + amoxicillin (Amx) (MD: 0.45 mm, MD: 0.53 mm, respectively; p < 0.00001) than SRP alone/placebo. Bayesian network meta‐analysis showed additional benefits in CA gain and PD reduction when SRP was associated with systemic antibiotics.
Conclusions
SRP plus systemic antibiotics led to an additional clinical effect compared with SRP alone in the treatment of AgP. Of the antibiotic protocols available for inclusion into the Bayesian network meta‐analysis, Mtz and Mtz/Amx provided to the most beneficial outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-MBVV3Q8J-L Appendix S1. Search strategy developed for searching MEDLINE (via PubMed) Appendix S2. Points assessed by the methodological quality tool Appendix S3. Forest plot of random effects meta-analysis evaluating the difference in clinical attachment level change between patients submitted to SRP + Placebo or SRP + Azithromycin (Azi). IV, Inverse variance; CI, Confidence interval; τ, Kendall tau; z, z test Appendix S4. Forest plot of random effects meta-analysis evaluating the difference in clinical attachment level change between patients submitted to SRP + Placebo or SRP + Doxycycline (Dox). IV, Inverse variance; CI, Confidence interval; τ, Kendall tau; z, z test. São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Brazil) - No. 2012/09645-1 National Science Council in Taiwan - No. NSC101-2314-B-002-197-MY2 istex:7188E58233A5E557ED633F1C27ADBC4460CA26D7 ArticleID:JCPE12427 The study was supported by the research grants 2012/09645‐1 from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Brazil) and NSC101‐2314‐B‐002‐197‐MY2 from the National Science Council in Taiwan. Conflict of Interest and source of funding statement The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this study. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 ObjectType-Article-3 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
ISSN: | 0303-6979 1600-051X |
DOI: | 10.1111/jcpe.12427 |