Anosmia in COVID-19 could be associated with long-term deficits in the consolidation of procedural and verbal declarative memories

• Published in: Frontiers in neuroscience Vol. 16; p. 1082811
• Main Authors: Llana, Tania, Mendez, Marta, Zorzo, Candela, Fidalgo, Camino, Juan, M-Carmen, Mendez-Lopez, Magdalena
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 09.12.2022; Frontiers Media S.A
• Subjects: Adaptation; Anosmia; Associative learning; Brain research; Cognition & reasoning; Cognitive ability; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; declarative memory; Health services; implicit memory; incidental learning; Infections; Limbic system; long-COVID; Long-term effects; Medical research; Memory; Metal fatigue; Neurogenesis; Neuropsychology; Neuroscience; Questionnaires; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Temporal lobe; Verbal learning; Viral infections; incidental learning; implicit memory; long-COVID; anosmia; declarative memory
• ISSN: 1662-4548; 1662-453X; 1662-453X
• DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1082811

Long-COVID describes the long-term effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In long-COVID patients, neuropsychological alterations are frequently reported symptoms. Research points to medial temporal lobe dysfunction and its association with anosmia in long-COVID patients. This study aims to investigate the acquisition and consolidation of declarative and procedural memory in long-COVID patients and to explore whether anosmia is related to these dissociated memory functions. Forty-two long-COVID participants and 30 controls (C) were recruited. The sample of long-COVID patients was divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of anosmia, group A and group NA, respectively. Objective performance in verbal declarative memory (Paired-Associate Learning, PAL), procedural memory (Mirror Tracing Test, MTT), general cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale), psychomotor speed, and incidental learning (Digit Symbol Substitution Test) were assessed and compared among the A, NA, and C groups. Long-term retention of PAL and MTT were assessed 24 h after acquisition. Lower scores in general cognition, psychomotor speed, and sustained attention were found in A and NA compared with C. However, incidental learning, both cue-guided and free-recalled, was diminished in group A compared with C, with no differences with group NA. General cognition and incidental learning were related to declarative memory function exclusively in long-COVID groups. Long-COVID groups presented lower long-term retention of verbal declarative memory than controls in recall tests but no differences in recognition tests. No group differences were found in the acquisition of procedural memory. However, long-term retention of this memory was worse in group A as compared to the NA and C groups, respectively, when errors and time of execution were considered. Findings support that consolidation of both procedural and declarative memories is more affected than the acquisition of these memories in long-COVID patients, who are also more vulnerable to deficits in delayed recall than in recognition of declarative memories. Deficits in the consolidation of procedural memory and immediate recall of declarative information are especially relevant in long-COVID participants with anosmia. This indicates that anosmia in COVID-19 could be associated with a long-term dysfunction of the limbic system.