Flood apprentices: an exercise in making things public

Taking our lead from Stengers' experimental constructivism, this paper reports on the invention of a research apparatus - the 'competency group' (CG) - that aims to put things capable of forcing thought and attachment to work in the exercise of new knowledge polities. It draws on the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEconomy and society Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 582 - 610
Main Authors Whatmore, Sarah J., Landström, Catharina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Taylor & Francis Group 01.11.2011
Taylor & Francis LLC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Taking our lead from Stengers' experimental constructivism, this paper reports on the invention of a research apparatus - the 'competency group' (CG) - that aims to put things capable of forcing thought and attachment to work in the exercise of new knowledge polities. It draws on the work of one such group based in Pickering, a town in the catchment of Ryedale with long experience of flooding. This group involved social and natural scientists working collaboratively with people affected by flooding over a twelve-month period, to interrogate the science that informs local flood management and intervene in the public controversy to which it had given rise. The paper focuses on the ways in which various artefacts that mediated our collective flood apprenticeship in Ryedale were recharged as publicity devices through which the working practices and knowledge claims of what became the Ryedale Flood Research Group gathered political force in the wake of the group's work.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0308-5147
1469-5766
DOI:10.1080/03085147.2011.602540